The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Metabolic Profiling Allows Comprehensive Phenotyping of Genetically or Environmentally Modified Plant Systems
Open accessAbstract
Metabolic profiling using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry technologies is a technique whose potential in the field of functional genomics is largely untapped. To demonstrate the general usefulness of this technique, we applied to diverse plant genotypes a recently developed profiling protocol that allows detection of a wide range of hydrophilic metabolites within a single chromatographic run. For this purpose, we chose four independent potato genotypes characterized by modifications in sucrose metabolism. Using data-mining tools, including hierarchical cluster analysis and principle component analysis, we were able to assign clusters to the individual plant systems and to determine relative distances between these clusters. Extraction analysis allowed identification of the most important components of these clusters. Furthermore, correlation analysis revealed close linkages between a broad spectrum of metabolites. In a second, complementary approach, we subjected wild-type potato tissue to environmental manipulations. The metabolic profiles from these experiments were compared with the data sets obtained for the transgenic systems, thus illustrating the potential of metabolic profiling in assessing how a genetic modification can be phenocopied by environmental conditions. In summary, these data demonstrate the use of metabolic profiling in conjunction with data-mining tools as a technique for the comprehensive characterization of a plant genotype.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metabolomics—the link between genotypes and phenotypes
Fiehn, O. (2002) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1013713905833 · Cited by 3,445
Self-citationWu, A., Allu, A. D., Garapati, P., Siddiqui, H., Dortay, H., Zanor, M.-I., Asensi-Fabado, M. A., Munné-Bosch, S., Antonio, C., Tohge, T., et al. (2012) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.111.090894 · Cited by 601
Self-citationMass appeal: metabolite identification in mass spectrometry-focused untargeted metabolomics
Dunn, W. B., Erban, A., Weber, R. J. M., Creek, D. J., Brown, M., Breitling, R., Hankemeier, T., Goodacre, R., Neumann, S., Kopka, J., et al. (2013) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-012-0434-4 · Cited by 555
Metabolomics-assisted breeding: a viable option for crop improvement?
Fernie, A. R., & Schauer, N. (2009) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2008.10.010 · Cited by 550
Self-citationTikunov, Y., Lommen, A., de Vos, C. H. R., Verhoeven, H. A., Bino, R. J., Hall, R. D., & Bovy, A. G. (2005) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.105.068130 · Cited by 513
Metadata
- Authors
- Roessner, U., Luedemann, A., Brust, D., Fiehn, O., Linke, T., Willmitzer, L., & Fernie, A. R.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-29
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2162314707
- Cited by
- 1,017
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolic Profiling Allows Comprehensive Phenotyping of Genetically or Environmentally Modified Plant Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.13.1.11
- The paper
- Roessner, U., Luedemann, A., Brust, D., Fiehn, O., Linke, T., Willmitzer, L., & Fernie, A. R. (2001). Metabolic Profiling Allows Comprehensive Phenotyping of Genetically or Environmentally Modified Plant Systems. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.13.1.11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.