Cited by 22Light effects on plantsPlant Molecular Biology ResearchPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research

Arabidopsis ROOT PHOTOTROPISM2 Is a Light-Dependent Dynamic Modulator of Phototropin1

Open access
Kimura, Taro, Tsuchida-Mayama, Tomoko, Imai, Hirotatsu, Okajima, Koji, Ito, Kosuke, Sakai, Tatsuya·2020·The Plant Cell

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

) blue light photoreceptor phototropin1 (phot1) is a blue light-activated Ser/Thr protein kinase that mediates various light responses, including phototropism. The function of phot1 in hypocotyl phototropism is dependent on the light induction of ROOT PHOTOTROPISM2 (RPT2) proteins within a broad range of blue light intensities. It is not yet known however how RPT2 contributes to the photosensory adaptation of phot1 to high intensity blue light and the phototropic responses under bright light conditions. We show that RPT2 suppresses the activity of phot1 and demonstrate that RPT2 binds to the PHOT1 light, oxygen or voltage sensing1 (LOV1) domain that is required for its high photosensitivity. Our biochemical analyses revealed that RPT2 inhibits autophosphorylation of phot1, suggesting that it suppresses the photosensitivity and/or kinase activity of phot1 through the inhibition of LOV1 function. We found that RPT2 proteins are degraded via a ubiquitin-proteasome pathway when phot1 is inactive and are stabilized under blue light in a phot1-dependent manner. We propose that RPT2 is a molecular rheostat that maintains a moderate activation level of phot1 under any light intensity conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1105/tpc.19.00926

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RPT2 may play a key role in cross-regulation of phototropism and chloroplast movement.

    “Therefore, RPT2 may play a key role in cross-regulation of phototropism and chloroplast movement.”

    From The action of enhancing weak light capture via phototropic growth and chloroplast movement in plants (2022) · cites this paper as Kimura et al., 2020

    The Discussion (page unavailable) supports RPT2’s role in phototropism and says that NCH1 functions in the chloroplast accumulation response in parallel with RPT2. It hypothesizes a shared effect on phot2, but does not establish that RPT2 cross-regulates phototropism and chloroplast movement or plays a key role in doing so. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The probable mechanism by which RPT2 maintains a moderate activation level in a phot1-dependent manner is to adapt to different light intensities.

    “In plant, the probable mechanism of RPT2 maintains a moderate activation level in a phot1 dependent manner is to adapt different light intensities (Kimura et al., 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 22

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ausubel F.M., Brent R., Kingston R.E., Moore D.D., Seidman J.G., Smith J.A., Struhl K.(2001). Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. (New York: John Wiley & Sons; ). [Google Scholar]
  2. Clough R.C., Vierstra R.D.(1997). Phytochrome degradation. Plant Cell Environ. 20: 713–721. [Google Scholar]
  3. Li J., Li G., Wang H., Deng X.Q.(2011). Phytochrome signaling mechanism In The Arabidopsis Book, Volume 9, p. e0148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Authors
Kimura, T., Tsuchida-Mayama, T., Imai, H., Okajima, K., Ito, K., & Sakai, T.
Affiliations
  • Niigata University (JP)
  • RIKEN Plant Science Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP)
  • Keio University (JP)
Corresponding author
Sakai, Tatsuya
Venue
The Plant Cell
Published
2020-03-25
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
2004-2019
ISSN
  • 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-298X
OpenAlex
W3013529447
Cited by
22
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Plant Cell (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22570058, 25120710, 16H01231, 17H03694, 18K19329)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
Keywords
Rpt2, blue light photoreception, phototropism, hypocotyl, ubiquitin-proteasome degradation, protein stability, Arabidopsis thaliana, light intensity
MeSH terms
DNA-Binding Proteins, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Arabidopsis, Arabidopsis Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review