The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of ionizing radiation on a plant genome: analysis of two Arabidopsis transparent testa mutations.
Open accessAbstract
Ionizing radiation is known to cause chromosomal alterations such as inversions and deletions and has been used extensively for inducing mutations. In Arabidopsis, two methods for the isolation of genes identified on the basis of mutant phenotypes--genomic subtraction and chromosome walking--either rely on or are greatly facilitated by the availability of these types of mutations. This article gives a detailed characterization of ionizing radiation-induced mutations in plants. The Arabidopsis genes encoding chalcone flavanone isomerase (CHI) and dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR) were cloned and found to correspond to two transparent testa loci. A CHI allele, generated by fast-neutron irradiation, consisted of an inversion within the gene. A 272-bp fragment from 38 centimorgans away on the same chromosome was transferred to one end of this inversion. A DFR allele, induced by x-irradiation, contained two deletions and an inversion of the 2.8-centimorgan intervening region. Sequence analysis of the break points in both mutants indicate that repair of radiation-induced damage involves mechanisms similar or identical to those that mediate the integration of foreign sequences into the genome. The chromosome rearrangements found in these mutants have important implications for the use of ionizing radiation-induced alleles in classical and molecular genetic experiments in plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA
Birnboim, H. C., & Doly, J. (1979) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/7.6.1513 · Cited by 14,686
Cited by
Nesi, N., Debeaujon, I., Jond, C., Pelletier, G., Caboche, M., & Lepiniec, L. (2000) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.12.10.1863 · Cited by 747
Phytochelatin Synthase Genes from Arabidopsis and the Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Ha, S.-B., Smith, A. P., Howden, R., Dietrich, W. M., Bugg, S., O'Connell, M. J., Goldsbrough, P. B., & Cobbett, C. S. (1999) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.11.6.1153 · Cited by 659
The repair of double-strand breaks in plants: mechanisms and consequences for genome evolution
Puchta, H. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eri025 · Cited by 601
Li, P., Li, Y., Zhang, F., Zhang, G., Jiang, X., Yu, H., & Hou, B. (2017) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13324 · Cited by 574
DNA DAMAGE AND REPAIR IN PLANTS
Britt, A. B. (1996) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.75 · Cited by 486
Metadata
- Authors
- Shirley, B. W., Hanley, S., & Goodman, H. M.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 333-347
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2161488975
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of ionizing radiation on a plant genome: analysis of two Arabidopsis transparent testa mutations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.4.3.333
- The paper
- Shirley, B. W., Hanley, S., & Goodman, H. M. (1992). Effects of ionizing radiation on a plant genome: analysis of two Arabidopsis transparent testa mutations. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.4.3.333
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.