The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Correction of intensities for preferred orientation in powder diffractometry: application of the March model
Abstract
Diffracted intensities from axially symmetric flat-plate or capillary specimens, composed of effectively rod- or disk-shaped crystallites, can be corrected for preferred orientation with a single pole-density profile. A convenient procedure is to approximate this profile with a function whose variable parameters are fit during least-squares structure refinement. Several functions have previously been suggested but without theoretical justification. The present study reviews the derivation of this method and examines its assumptions and applications. The several proposed functions are compared with each other and with the March function which describes the pole-density distribution produced by rigid-body rotation of inequant crystallites (i.e. crystallites with unequal sides) upon axially symmetric volume-conserving compression or expansion. For its basis, ease of use, single variable parameter, direct interpretability and good refinement test results, the March distribution is proposed as an advantageous pole-density profile function for general use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Templated Grain Growth of Textured Piezoelectric Ceramics
Messing, G. L., Trolier-McKinstry, S., Sabolsky, E. M., Duran, C., Kwon, S., Brahmaroutu, B., Park, P., Yilmaz, H., Rehrig, P. W., Eitel, K. B., et al. (2004) · Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences · doi:10.1080/10408430490490905 · Cited by 624
Continuous excitations of the triangular-lattice quantum spin liquid YbMgGaO4
Paddison, J. A. M., Daum, M., Dun, Z., Ehlers, G., Liu, Y., Stone, M. B., Zhou, H., & Mourigal, M. (2017) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3971 · Cited by 423
Wilson, S. A. (2006) · American Mineralogist · doi:10.2138/am.2006.2058 · Cited by 172
Kaczmarek, S. E., Gregg, J. M., Bish, D. L., Machel, H. G., & Fouke, B. W. (2017) · Characterization and Modeling of Carbonates–Mountjoy Symposium 1 · doi:10.2110/sepmsp.109.01 · Cited by 95
Wilson, S., Raudsepp, M., & Dipple, G. M. (2009) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2009.09.018 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Dollase, W. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Crystallography
- Published
- 1986-08-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 267-272
- ISSN
- 0021-8898 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013235808
- Cited by
- 1,690
- References
- 0
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correction of intensities for preferred orientation in powder diffractometry: application of the March model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1107/s0021889886089458
- The paper
- Dollase, W. A. (1986). Correction of intensities for preferred orientation in powder diffractometry: application of the March model. Journal of Applied Crystallography. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889886089458
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.