The DOI matches its Crossref record.
SAXS experiments on absolute scale with Kratky systems using water as a secondary standard
Abstract
For small-angle scattering, of X-rays (SAXS) and neutrons (SANS), the importance of absolute calibration has been recognized since the inception of the technique. The work reported here focuses on SAXS measurements using Kratky slit systems. In former days, only molecular weights or scattering per particle were determined, but today absolute calibration implies the use of the unit of cm−1 for the scattering curve. It is necessary to measure the so-called absolute intensity, which is the ratio of the scattering intensity to the primary intensity P0. Basically there are two possible ways to determine the absolute intensity. The first one is the direct method, which involves the mechanical attenuation of the primary beam by a rotating disc or a moving slit. The second is the indirect method, using secondary standards. Water is well suited as a calibration standard because of the angle-independent scattering. The essential advantage is that the scattering of water only depends on the physical property of isothermal compressibility. Before presenting an example of the practical performance of this method, the most important theoretical equations for an SAS experiment on the absolute scale are summarized. With the slit collimation system, the scattering curve of water can be measured with high enough statistical accuracy. As a first example, the scattering curve of the protein lysozyme on the absolute scale is presented. The second example is the determination of the aggregation number of a triblock copolymer P94 (EO 17–PO 42–EO 17). Taking into account that at least 10% of the polymer sample consists of diblocks, the accuracy of around 10% for the determined aggregation number is rather good. The data of P94 are also considered on the particle scale in order to obtain the radial scattering-length density distribution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ATSAS 3.0: expanded functionality and new tools for small-angle scattering data analysis
Manalastas-Cantos, K., Konarev, P. V., Hajizadeh, N. R., Kikhney, A. G., Petoukhov, M. V., Molodenskiy, D. S., Panjkovich, A., Mertens, H. D. T., Gruzinov, A., Borges, C., et al. (2021) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s1600576720013412 · Cited by 964
Accurate assessment of mass, models and resolution by small-angle scattering
Rambo, R. P., & Tainer, J. A. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12070 · Cited by 750
Structural characterization of proteins and complexes using small-angle X-ray solution scattering
Mertens, H. D. T., & Svergun, D. I. (2010) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2010.06.012 · Cited by 567
Small‐angle scattering for structural biology—Expanding the frontier while avoiding the pitfalls
Jacques, D. A., & Trewhella, J. (2010) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.351 · Cited by 435
Hendel, T., Wuithschick, M., Kettemann, F., Birnbaum, A., Rademann, K., & Polte, J. (2014) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac502053s · Cited by 235
Metadata
- Authors
- Orthaber, D., Bergmann, A., & Glatter, O.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Crystallography
- Published
- 2000-04-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 218-225
- ISSN
- 0021-8898 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070395446
- Cited by
- 607
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SAXS experiments on absolute scale with Kratky systems using water as a secondary standard. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1107/s0021889899015216
- The paper
- Orthaber, D., Bergmann, A., & Glatter, O. (2000). SAXS experiments on absolute scale with Kratky systems using water as a secondary standard. Journal of Applied Crystallography. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889899015216
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.