Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 704

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Computational crystallography

Open access
Winkler, B.·2012·Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography

Abstract

Atomistic model calculations are now an established approach for the studies of structure-property relations.While for inorganic compounds, density functional theory-based calculations dominate, computationally more efficient "force field" models continue to maintain to play an important role as they allow to follow the trajectory of millions of atoms as a function of time.In this contribution, I will summarize some recent studies which represent the current state-of-the-art of investigations of structure-property relations of crystals with atomistic models.The emphasis will place on explaining how atomistic model calculations complement more traditional crystallographic investigations, and to compare advantages and limitations of various approaches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1107/s0108767312099825

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 704

Metadata

Authors
Winkler, B.
Venue
Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography
Published
2012-08-07
Volume
68
Issue
a1
Pages
s9-s9
ISSN
0108-7673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4246627839
Cited by
704
References
0
FWCI
0.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational crystallography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1107/s0108767312099825
The paper
Winkler, B. (2012). Computational crystallography. Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0108767312099825

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.