Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 10,382

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On enantiomorph-polarity estimation

Flack, H. D.·1983·Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography

Abstract

The behaviour of Rogers's η parameter for enantiomorph-polarity estimation is examined theoretically and experimentally on simulated intensity data for seven well-assorted compounds. An alternative parameter x, based on incoherent scattering from twin components related by a centre of symmetry, is also considered. It is found that both parameters are very well adapted to implementation in a least-squares program and converge well. The η parameter can give false and over-precise indications of chirality-polarity for structures which are nearly centrosymmetric, whereas the x parameter does not have this fault and converges more rapidly than η.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1107/s0108767383001762

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 10,382

Metadata

Authors
Flack, H. D.
Venue
Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography
Published
1983-11-01
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
876-881
ISSN
0108-7673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128179591
Cited by
10,382
References
0
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On enantiomorph-polarity estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1107/s0108767383001762
The paper
Flack, H. D. (1983). On enantiomorph-polarity estimation. Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0108767383001762

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.