The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Knowledge-based model of hydrogen-bonding propensity in organic crystals
Abstract
A new method is presented to predict which donors and acceptors form hydrogen bonds in a crystal structure, based on the statistical analysis of hydrogen bonds in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD). The method is named the logit hydrogen-bonding propensity (LHP) model. The approach has a potential application in identifying both likely and unusual hydrogen bonding, which can help to rationalize stable and metastable crystalline forms, of relevance to drug development in the pharmaceutical industry. Whilst polymorph prediction techniques are widely used, the LHP model is knowledge-based and is not restricted by the computational issues of polymorph prediction, and as such may form a valuable precursor to polymorph screening. Model construction applies logistic regression, using training data obtained with a new survey method based on the CSD system. The survey categorizes the hydrogen bonds and extracts model parameter values using descriptive structural and chemical properties from three-dimensional organic crystal structures. LHP predictions from a fitted model are made using two-dimensional observables alone. In the initial cases analysed, the model is highly accurate, achieving ∼ 90% correct classification of both observed hydrogen bonds and non-interacting donor–acceptor pairs. Extensive statistical validation shows the LHP model to be robust across a range of small-molecule organic crystal structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination
NAGELKERKE, N. J. D. (1991) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/78.3.691 · Cited by 5,927
Cited by
Facts and fictions about polymorphism
Cruz-Cabeza, A. J., Reutzel-Edens, S. M., & Bernstein, J. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00227c · Cited by 678
A Practical Guide to the Design of Molecular Crystals
Corpinot, M. K., & Bučar, D.-K. (2019) · Crystal Growth & Design · doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.8b00972 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Galek, P. T. A., Fábián, L., Motherwell, W. D. S., Allen, F. H., & Feeder, N.
- Venue
- Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science
- Published
- 2007-09-14
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 768-782
- ISSN
- 0108-7681 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999269416
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knowledge-based model of hydrogen-bonding propensity in organic crystals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1107/s0108768107030996
- The paper
- Galek, P. T. A., Fábián, L., Motherwell, W. D. S., Allen, F. H., & Feeder, N. (2007). Knowledge-based model of hydrogen-bonding propensity in organic crystals. Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0108768107030996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.