The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rutile-type compounds. IV. SiO2, GeO2 and a comparison with other rutile-type structures
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mini review on photocatalysis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles and their solar applications
Lan, Y., Lu, Y., & Ren, Z. (2013) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2013.04.002 · Cited by 419
Sources of Electrical Conductivity inSnO2
Singh, A. K., Janotti, A., Scheffler, M., & Van de Walle, C. G. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.055502 · Cited by 388
Phase Stability of the Earth-Abundant Tin Sulfides SnS, SnS2, and Sn2S3
Burton, L. A., & Walsh, A. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp309154s · Cited by 256
Prabhu, P., Do, V.-H., Yoshida, T., Zhou, Y., Ariga-Miwa, H., Kaneko, T., Uruga, T., Iwasawa, Y., & Lee, J.-M. (2024) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c10219 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Baur, W. H., & Khan, A. A.
- Venue
- Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Crystallography and Crystal Chemistry
- Published
- 1971-11-15
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2133-2139
- ISSN
- 0567-7408 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998092895
- Cited by
- 617
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rutile-type compounds. IV. SiO2, GeO2 and a comparison with other rutile-type structures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1107/s0567740871005466
- The paper
- Baur, W. H., & Khan, A. A. (1971). Rutile-type compounds. IV. SiO2, GeO2 and a comparison with other rutile-type structures. Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Crystallography and Crystal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0567740871005466
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
