Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 584

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Report on the sixth blind test of organic crystal structure prediction methods

Open access
Reilly, Anthony M., Cooper, Richard I., Adjiman, Claire S., Bhattacharya, Saswata, Boese, A. Daniel, Brandenburg, Jan Gerit, Bygrave, Peter J., Bylsma, Rita, Campbell, Josh E., Car, Roberto, Case, David H., Chadha, Renu, Cole, Jason C., Cosburn, Katherine, Cuppen, Herma M., Curtis, Farren, Day, Graeme M., DiStasio Jr, Robert A., Dzyabchenko, Alexander, van Eijck, Bouke P., Elking, Dennis M., van den Ende, Joost A., Facelli, Julio C., Ferraro, Marta B., Fusti-Molnar, Laszlo, Gatsiou, Christina-Anna, Gee, Thomas S., de Gelder, René, Ghiringhelli, Luca M., Goto, Hitoshi, Grimme, Stefan, Guo, Rui, Hofmann, Detlef W. M., Hoja, Johannes, Hylton, Rebecca K., Iuzzolino, Luca, Jankiewicz, Wojciech, de Jong, Daniël T., Kendrick, John, de Klerk, Niek J. J., Ko, Hsin-Yu, Kuleshova, Liudmila N., Li, Xiayue, Lohani, Sanjaya, Leusen, Frank J. J., Lund, Albert M., Lv, Jian, Ma, Yanming, Marom, Noa, Masunov, Artëm E., McCabe, Patrick, McMahon, David P., Meekes, Hugo, Metz, Michael P., Misquitta, Alston J., Mohamed, Sharmarke, Monserrat, Bartomeu, Needs, Richard J., Neumann, Marcus A., Nyman, Jonas, Obata, Shigeaki, Oberhofer, Harald, Oganov, Artem R., Orendt, Anita M., Pagola, Gabriel I., Pantelides, Constantinos C., Pickard, Chris J., Podeszwa, Rafal, Price, Louise S., Price, Sarah L., Pulido, Angeles, Read, Murray G., Reuter, Karsten, Schneider, Elia, Schober, Christoph, Shields, Gregory P., Singh, Pawanpreet, Sugden, Isaac J., Szalewicz, Krzysztof, Taylor, Christopher R., Tkatchenko, Alexandre, Tuckerman, Mark E., Vacarro, Francesca, Vasileiadis, Manolis, Vazquez-Mayagoitia, Alvaro, Vogt, Leslie, Wang, Yanchao, Watson, Rona E., de Wijs, Gilles A., Yang, Jack, Zhu, Qiang, Groom, Colin R.·2016·Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials
DOI 10.1107/s2052520616007447
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The sixth blind test of organic crystal structure prediction (CSP) methods has been held, with five target systems: a small nearly rigid molecule, a polymorphic former drug candidate, a chloride salt hydrate, a co-crystal and a bulky flexible molecule. This blind test has seen substantial growth in the number of participants, with the broad range of prediction methods giving a unique insight into the state of the art in the field. Significant progress has been seen in treating flexible molecules, usage of hierarchical approaches to ranking structures, the application of density-functional approximations, and the establishment of new workflows and `best practices' for performing CSP calculations. All of the targets, apart from a single potentially disordered Z′ = 2 polymorph of the drug candidate, were predicted by at least one submission. Despite many remaining challenges, it is clear that CSP methods are becoming more applicable to a wider range of real systems, including salts, hydrates and larger flexible molecules. The results also highlight the potential for CSP calculations to complement and augment experimental studies of organic solid forms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1107/s2052520616007447

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 75 references

Cited by

See all 584

Metadata

Authors
Reilly, A. M., Cooper, R. I., Adjiman, C. S., Bhattacharya, S., Boese, A. D., Brandenburg, J. G., Bygrave, P. J., Bylsma, R., Campbell, J. E., Car, R., Case, D. H., Chadha, R., Cole, J. C., Cosburn, K., Cuppen, H. M., Curtis, F., Day, G. M., DiStasio Jr, R. A., Dzyabchenko, A., van Eijck, B. P., Elking, D. M., van den Ende, J. A., Facelli, J. C., Ferraro, M. B., Fusti-Molnar, L., Gatsiou, C.-A., Gee, T. S., de Gelder, R., Ghiringhelli, L. M., Goto, H., Grimme, S., Guo, R., Hofmann, D. W. M., Hoja, J., Hylton, R. K., Iuzzolino, L., Jankiewicz, W., de Jong, D. T., Kendrick, J., de Klerk, N. J. J., Ko, H.-Y., Kuleshova, L. N., Li, X., Lohani, S., Leusen, F. J. J., Lund, A. M., Lv, J., Ma, Y., Marom, N., Masunov, A. E., McCabe, P., McMahon, D. P., Meekes, H., Metz, M. P., Misquitta, A. J., Mohamed, S., Monserrat, B., Needs, R. J., Neumann, M. A., Nyman, J., Obata, S., Oberhofer, H., Oganov, A. R., Orendt, A. M., Pagola, G. I., Pantelides, C. C., Pickard, C. J., Podeszwa, R., Price, L. S., Price, S. L., Pulido, A., Read, M. G., Reuter, K., Schneider, E., Schober, C., Shields, G. P., Singh, P., Sugden, I. J., Szalewicz, K., Taylor, C. R., Tkatchenko, A., Tuckerman, M. E., Vacarro, F., Vasileiadis, M., Vazquez-Mayagoitia, A., Vogt, L., Wang, Y., Watson, R. E., de Wijs, G. A., Yang, J., Zhu, Q., & Groom, C. R.
Venue
Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials
Publisher
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
Published
2016-08-01
Volume
72
Issue
4
Pages
439-459
ISSN
  • 2052-5192 (ISSN-L)
  • 2052-5206
DOI
10.1107/s2052520616007447
OpenAlex
W2482115826
Cited by
584
References
75
FWCI
46.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Report on the sixth blind test of organic crystal structure prediction methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1107/s2052520616007447
The paper
Reilly, A. M., Cooper, R. I., Adjiman, C. S., Bhattacharya, S., Boese, A. D., Brandenburg, J. G., Bygrave, P. J., Bylsma, R., Campbell, J. E., Car, R., Case, D. H., Chadha, R., Cole, J. C., Cosburn, K., Cuppen, H. M., Curtis, F., Day, G. M., DiStasio Jr, R. A., Dzyabchenko, A., . . . Groom, C. R. (2016). Report on the sixth blind test of organic crystal structure prediction methods. Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials. https://doi.org/10.1107/s2052520616007447

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.