Q -score as a reliability measure for protein, nucleic acid and small-molecule atomic coordinate models derived from 3DEM maps
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Atomic coordinate models are important for the interpretation of 3D maps produced with cryoEM and cryoET (3D electron microscopy; 3DEM). In addition to visual inspection of such maps and models, quantitative metrics can inform about the reliability of the atomic coordinates, in particular how well the model is supported by the experimentally determined 3DEM map. A recently introduced metric, Q -score, was shown to correlate well with the reported resolution of the map for well fitted models. Here, we present new statistical analyses of Q -score based on its application to ∼10 000 maps and models archived in the EMDB (Electron Microscopy Data Bank) and PDB (Protein Data Bank). Further, we introduce two new metrics based on Q -score to represent each map and model relative to all entries in the EMDB and those with similar resolution. We explore through illustrative examples of proteins, nucleic acids and small molecules how Q -scores can indicate whether the atomic coordinates are well fitted to 3DEM maps and also whether some parts of a map may be poorly resolved due to factors such as molecular flexibility, radiation damage and/or conformational heterogeneity. These examples and statistical analyses provide a basis for how Q -scores can be interpreted effectively in order to evaluate 3DEM maps and atomic coordinate models prior to publication and archiving.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Automated model building and protein identification in cryo-EM maps
Jamali, K., Käll, L., Zhang, R., Brown, A., Kimanius, D., & Scheres, S. H. W. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.05.16.541002 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Pintilie, G., Shao, C., Wang, Z., Hudson, B. P., Flatt, J. W., Schmid, M. F., Morris, K. L., Burley, S. K., & Chiu, W.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chiu, Wah
- ORCID
- Venue
- Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
- Published
- 2025-07-14
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 410-422
- ISSN
- 2059-7983 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12315582
- OpenAlex
- W4412388667
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 5
- FWCI
- 7.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R24GM154186, P41GM103311, R01GM129325, R01GM157729)
- National Science Foundation, Directorate for Biological Sciences (DBI-2321666)
- U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science (DE-SC0019749)
- Wellcome Trust (212977/Z/18/Z)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- Q-score, model reliability, map resolution, EMDB, conformational heterogeneity, radiation damage, molecular flexibility, nucleic acid models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review