The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Domain analysis in information science: Eleven approaches – traditional as well as innovative
Abstract
What kind of knowledge is needed by information specialists working in a specific subject field like medicine, sociology or music? What approaches have been used in information science to produce kinds of domain‐specific knowledge? This article presents 11 approaches to domain analysis. Together these approaches make a unique competence for information specialists. The approaches are: producing literature guides and subject gateways; producing special classifications and thesauri; research on indexing and retrieving specialities; empirical user studies; bibliometrical studies; historical studies; document and genre studies; epistemological and critical studies; terminological studies, LSP (languages for special purposes), discourse studies; studies of structures and institutions in scientific communication; and domain analysis in professional cognition and artificial intelligence. Specific examples and selective reviews of literature are provided, and the strengths and drawbacks of each of these approaches are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-4175 · Cited by 12,693
Foucault, M. (1970) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/053901847000900108 · Cited by 10,859
Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests
(1961) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(61)80061-2 · Cited by 6,939
Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001 · Cited by 6,188
Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences
(2000) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/s0099-1333(00)00155-5 · Cited by 5,210
Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings
James, M. O., & Swales, J. M. (1992) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/329786 · Cited by 4,694
Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations
Sowa, J. F. (1999) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 2,590
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
Seglen, P. O. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497 · Cited by 2,447
Constructing the Subject: Historical Origins of Psychological Research
Danziger, K. (1990) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511524059 · Cited by 1,750
Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities
Goodwin, J., & Garfield, E. (1980) · Technology and Culture · doi:10.2307/3104125 · Cited by 1,639
Cited by
Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior
(2016) · Studies in Information · doi:10.1108/s2055-53772016 · Cited by 1,540
“Isms” in information science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionism
Talja, S., Tuominen, K., & Savolainen, R. (2005) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/00220410510578023 · Cited by 364
Epistemology and the socio‐cognitive perspective in information science
Hjørland, B. (2002) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.10042 · Cited by 307
Self-citationPayroll system: A bibliometric analysis of the literature
Rusly, F. H., Ahmi, A., Talib, Y. Y. A., & Rosli, K. (2018) · AIP Conference Proceedings · doi:10.1063/1.5055526 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Hjørland, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Documentation
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2002-08-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 422-462
- ISSN
- 0022-0418 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1504737315
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 31.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Domain analysis in information science: Eleven approaches – traditional as well as innovative. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/00220410210431136
- The paper
- Hjørland, B. (2002). Domain analysis in information science: Eleven approaches – traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410210431136
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.