The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study
Abstract
“Serendipity” has both a classical origin in literature and a more modern manifestation where it is found in the descriptions of the problem solving and knowledge acquisition of humanities and science scholars. Studies of information retrieval and information seeking have also discussed the utility of the notion of serendipity. Some have implied that it may be stimulated, or that certain people may “encounter” serendipitous information more than others. All to some extent accept the classical definition of serendipity as a “fortuitous” accident. The analysis presented here is part of a larger study concerning the information‐seeking behaviour of interdisciplinary scholars. This paper considers the nature of serendipity in information‐seeking contexts, and reinterprets the notion of serendipity as a phenomenon arising from both conditions and strategies – as both a purposive and a non‐purposive component of information seeking and related knowledge acquisition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVES OF INFORMATION RETRIEVAL INTERACTION: ELEMENTS OF A COGNITIVE IR THEORY
INGWERSEN, P. (1996) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/eb026960 · Cited by 717 · cited 4×
“behaviour, for example those of Ingwersen (1996) , Wilson (Wilson and Walsh, 1996; Wilson,”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior
(2016) · Studies in Information · doi:10.1108/s2055-53772016 · Cited by 1,540
Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm
White, R. W., & Roth, R. A. (2009) · Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services · doi:10.2200/s00174ed1v01y200901icr003 · Cited by 632
Kaminskas, M., & Bridge, D. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/2926720 · Cited by 465
Sensecape: Enabling Multilevel Exploration and Sensemaking with Large Language Models
Suh, S., Min, B., Palani, S., & Xia, H. (2023) · Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/3586183.3606756 · Cited by 151
Distort, Extort, Deceive and Exploit: Exploring the Inner Workings of a Romance Fraud
Carter, E. (2021) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azaa072 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Foster, A., & Ford, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Documentation
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2003-06-01
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 321-340
- ISSN
- 0022-0418 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011698639
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 43.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/00220410310472518
- The paper
- Foster, A., & Ford, N. (2003). Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study. Journal of Documentation. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410310472518
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.