Cited by 214Library Science and Information LiteracyEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesDigital literacy in education

Self‐efficacy: a concept closely linked to information literacy and lifelong learning

Open access
Serap Kurbanoglu, S.·2003·Journal of Documentation

Abstract

This paper is primarily concerned with self‐efficacy in the context of information literacy. The focus is first on the concept of self‐efficacy, followed by attainment of self‐efficacy beliefs. Finally, findings of the research, the aim of which was to explore students’ (who enrolled in the Department of Information Management, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey) perceived self‐efficacy for information and computer literacy, are scrutinized. Results of the research indicate no significant year‐to‐year changes, although the students have a positive perceived self‐efficacy for information literacy. Students’ self‐efficacy beliefs regarding information literacy and computers are correlated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/00220410310506295

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The number of research studies regarding self-efficacy for information literacy is few.

    “However, the number of the research regarding self-efficacy for information literacy, are few in number (Akkoyunlu and Kurbanoglu, 2003; Kurbanoglu, 2003; Kurbanoglu and Akkoyunlu, 2003).”

    From Developing the information literacy self‐efficacy scale (2006) · cites this paper as Kurbanoglu, 2003

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Akkoyunlu, B. and Kurbanog ˘lu, S. (2003), "O ¨g ˘retmen adaylarının bilgi okuryazarlıg ˘ı ve bilgisayar o ¨z-yeterlik algıları u ¨zerine bir c ¸alısma" ("A study on initial teacher training students' perceived self-efficacy for information literacy and computers"), Hacettepe U ¨niversitesi Eg ˘itim Faku ¨ltesi Dergisi, Vol. 24, pp. 1-10. JD 59,6 American Association of School Librarians and Association for Educational Communications and Technology (1998), Information Literacy Standards for Student Learning, American Library Association, Chicago, IL.
  2. Askar, P. and Umay, A. (2001), "I ˙lko ¨g ˘retim matematik o ¨g ˘retmenlig ˘i o ¨g ˘retmen adaylarının bilgisayarla ilgili o ¨z-yeterlik algısı" ("Perceived computer self-efficacy of the students in the elementary mathematics teaching programme"), Hacettepe U ¨niversitesi Eg ˘itim Faku ¨ltesi Dergisi, Vol. 21, pp. 1-8. Association of College and Research Libraries (2000), Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education: Standards, Performance I ˙ndicators, and Outcomes, ACRL, available at: www.ala.org/acrl/ilstandardlo.html (accessed 21 July 2003). Association of College and Research Libraries (2001), Objectives for I ˙nformation Literacy I ˙nstruction: A Model Statement for Academic Librarians, ACRL, available at: www.ala.org/acrl/guides/objinfolit.html (accessed 21 July 2003).
  3. Bandura, A. (1977), "Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behaviour change", Psychological Review, Vol. 84, pp. 191-215.
  4. Bandura, A. (1994), "Self-efficacy", in Ramachaudran, V.S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, Vol. 4, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 71-81.
  5. Bandura, A. (1995), "Exercise of personel and collective efficacy in changing socities", in Bandura, A. (Ed.), Self-efficacy in Changing Socities, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp. 1-45.
  6. Bawden, D. (2001), "Progress in documentation: information and digital literacies: a review of concepts", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 218-59.
  7. Carson, C.H. (1993), "The development of a scale to measure the self-efficacy of school media specialists", School Library Media Quarterly, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 165-70.
  8. Compeau, D.R. and Higgins, C.A. (1995), "Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test", MIS Quarterly, June, pp. 189-211.
  9. Delcourt, M. and Kinzie, M. (1993), "Computer technologies in teacher education: the measurement of attitudes and self-efficacy", Journal of Research and Development in Education, Vol. 27, pp. 31-7.
  10. Geer, R., White, B. and Barr, A. (1998), "The effect of an information literacy subject on teacher education students computing self-efficacy", available at: www.cegsa.sa.edu.au/ conference/acec98/acec98.htm (accessed 8 April 2003).
  11. Hill, T., Smith, N.D. and Mann, M.F. (1987), "Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: the case of computers", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 72 No. 2, pp. 307-13.
  12. Karsten, R. and Roth, M.R. (1998), "The relationship of computer experience and computer self-efficacy to performance in introductory computer literacy courses", Journal of Research on Technology Education, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 14-24.
  13. Koul, R. and Rubba, P. (1999), "An analysis of the reliability and validity of personal internet teaching efficacy beliefs scale", Electronic Journal of Science Education, available at: http:// unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/koulrubba.html (accessed 27 December 2002).
  14. Lev, E.L. (1997), "Bandura's theory of self-efficacy: applications to oncology", Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 21-42.
  15. Hardin, S. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Baltimore, MD, 21-24 October 1996, Information Today Inc./American Society for Information Science, Medford, NJ, pp. 100-9.
  16. O'Leary, A. (1985), "Self-efficacy and health", Behavioral Research & Technology, Vol. 23, pp. 437-51.
  17. Ren, W.H. (1999), "Self-efficacy and the search for government information: a study of small-business executives", Reference and User Services Quarterly, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 283-91.
  18. Schunk, D.H. (1985), "Self-efficacy and classroom learning", Psychology in the Schools, Vol. 22, pp. 208-23.
  19. Watson, G. (1997), "Pre-service teachers' views on their information technology education", Journal of Information Technology Education, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 255-69.
  20. Zimmerman, B.J. (1995), "Self-efficacy and educational development", in Bandura, A. (Ed.), Self-efficacy in Changing Socities, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp. 202-31. JD 59,6

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Serap Kurbanoglu, S.
Venue
Journal of Documentation
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2003-12-01
Volume
59
Issue
6
Pages
635-646
ISSN
0022-0418 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151415251
Cited by
214
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
14.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Documentation (publishedVersion)
  • Hacettepe University Institutional Repository (hacettepe.edu.tr) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
Keywords
self-efficacy, information literacy, lifelong learning, information management students, computer literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review