Cited by 287Library Science and Information LiteracyInformation Science and LibrariesLibrary Science and Information

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Information literacy landscapes: an emerging picture

Lloyd, Annemaree·2006·Journal of Documentation

Abstract

Purpose To describe the various landscapes in which information literacy has been explored and to propose new ways of thinking about information literacy. Design/methodology/approach Draws on constructivist‐influenced grounded theory method employed during doctoral research into information literacy practices of firefighters. Findings Information‐literate people are more usefully described as being engaged, enabled, enriched and embodied. Information literacy is conceptualized through this research as a way of knowing. The revised and extended definition is a more appropriate one to underpin an emerging ontological perspective on information literacy and to foster an understanding of information literacy as a meta‐competency. Research limitations/implications The research was limited to an in‐depth exploration of one professional group in one geographic location over 18 months. Practical implications The provision of a broader definition of the information literacy and the illustration of how information is perceived in a variety of concepts broadens librarians' and educators' understanding of information literacy. It offers librarians and educators a different way of thinking about information literacy. Originality/value This paper reports and expands upon original doctoral research of significance to information professionals and educators.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/00220410610688723

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Beckett, D. and Morris, G. (2001), “Ontological performance: bodies, identities and learning”, Studies in Education of Adults, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 35‐48. · DOI
  2. Beckett, D. and Morris, G. (2004), “Learning for/at work: Somali women ‘doing it for themselves’”, Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 16 Nos 1/2, pp. 75‐82. · DOI
  3. Billett, S. (2003), “Guiding vocational learning”, in Stevenson, J. (Ed.), Developing Vocational Expertise, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, pp. 226‐46. · DOI
  4. Billett, S., Barker, M. and Hernon‐Tinning, B. (2004), “Participatory practices at work”, Pedagogy, Culture and Society, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 233‐57. · DOI
  5. Breivik, P. (1998), Student Learning in the Information Age, Series on Higher Education, American Council on Education/Oryx Press, Phoenix, AZ.
  6. Bruce, C. (1996), “Information literacy: a phenomenography”, PhD thesis, University of New England, Armidale.
  7. Charmaz, K. (2003), “Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods”, in Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds), Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 249‐91.
  8. Cheuk, W.B. (1998), “Exploring information literacy in the workplace: a qualitative study of engineers using sense‐making approach”, International Forum on Information and Documentation, Vol. 23, pp. 30‐8.
  9. Cheville, J. (2005), “Confronting the problem of embodiment”, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 85‐107. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Daley, B. (1999), “Novice to expert: an exploration of how professionals learn”, Adult Education Quarterly, Vol. 49 No. 4, pp. 133‐47. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Gerber, R. and Oaklief, C. (2000), “Transfer of learning to strengthen workplace training”, in Gerber, R. and Lankshear, C. (Eds), Training for a Smart Workforce, Routledge, London, pp. 176‐92.
  12. Johnston, B. and Webber, S. (2003), “Information literacy in higher education: a review and case study”, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 335‐52. · DOI
  13. Kapitzke, C. (2003), “Information literacy: a review and poststructuralist critique”, Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 53‐66. · DOI
  14. Kirk, J. (2004), “Information and work: extending the roles of information professionals”, presented at Challenging Ideas, ALIA 2004 Biennial Conference, Gold Coast, Queensland, 21‐24 September, available at: www.conferences.alia.org.au/alia2004/pdfs/kirk.j.paper.pdf.
  15. Lloyd, A. (2003), “Information literacy: the meta‐competency of the knowledge economy? An exploratory paper”, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 87‐92. · DOI
  16. Lloyd, A. (2004a), “Working (in) formation: conceptualizing information literacy in the workplace”, Lifelong Learning: Whose Responsibility and What Is Your Contribution: Proceedings of 3rd International Life Long Learning Conference, 13‐16 June, Central Queensland University Press, Rockhampton, pp. 218‐24.
  17. Lloyd, A. (2004b), “Working information: developing a grounded theory of information literacy in the workplace”, PhD thesis, University of New England, Armidale.
  18. Lloyd, A. (2005), “Information literacy: different context, different concepts, different truths?”, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 82‐8. · DOI
  19. McMahon, C. and Bruce, C. (2002), “Information literacy needs of local staff in cross‐cultural development projects”, Journal of International Development, Vol. 14, pp. 113‐27. · DOI
  20. Meadow, C.T. and Yuan, W. (1997), “Measuring the impact of information: defining the concepts”, Information Processing & Management, Vol. 33 No. 6, pp. 697‐714. · DOI
  21. Todd, R. (2001), “The smart school: knowledge management working for your future”, paper presented at the ASLA XVII Biennial Conference SCIS Oration, available at: www.asla.org.au/Todd.pdf.
  22. Webber, S. and Johnston, B. (2000), “Conceptions of information literacy: new perspectives and implications”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 381‐7. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lloyd, A.
Venue
Journal of Documentation
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2006-09-01
Volume
62
Issue
5
Pages
570-583
ISSN
0022-0418 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049221684
Cited by
287
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
56.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Documentation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Information Science and Libraries
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
Keywords
information literacy, firefighters, meta-competencies, ontological perspective, librarianship, information education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review