The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategy implementation: a role for the balanced scorecard?
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop a deeper understanding of the role of the balanced scorecard in strategy implementation. Design/methodology/approach: This paper provides a review of strategy implementation literature to identify the main inhibitors of successful strategy implementation and then proceeds to critically review the balanced scorecard and evaluate the contribution it can make to strategy implementation, in particular how it may be able to mitigate the problems associated with strategy implementation. Findings: It is argued in the paper that the balanced scorecard, subject to the adoption of suitable processes, can address the key problems associated with strategy implementation including communication, the role of middle managers and integration with existing control systems. The study raises a series of research questions and proposes avenues for further research. Practical implications: More than half strategies devised by organisations are never actually implemented. At a time of increasing competition and globalisation; shorter lead times and increased customer sophistication, the effectiveness of strategy implementation is even more important. The findings of this study will provide the basis for research that will improve this vital management activity. Originality/value: The effective implementation of corporate strategy is often overlooked in strategic management literature. There is still recognition that there is a need for further research. By combining two eclectic fields of research, i.e. strategy implementation and performance measurement, it is proposed that new insights can be gained to inform future practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The balanced scorecard : measures that drive performance
Caplan, R. S. (1992) · Harvard business review · Cited by 12,085
The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action
(1997) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/s0024-6301(97)80925-9 · Cited by 8,192
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 7,979
Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996) · Harvard business review · Cited by 5,015
Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda
Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443579510083622 · Cited by 3,259
Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting
Johnson, T. H., & Kaplan, R. S. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,177
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2000) · Cited by 2,600
Ziegel, E. R., Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1998) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1271199 · Cited by 2,187
Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2003) · Cited by 2,045
Performance management: a framework for management control systems research
Otley, D. (1999) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1006/mare.1999.0115 · Cited by 2,023
Cited by
The practice of the Balanced Scorecard in health care services
Kollberg, B., & Elg, M. (2011) · International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management · doi:10.1108/17410401111140374 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Atkinson, H.
- Venue
- Management Decision
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-12-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1441-1460
- ISSN
- 0025-1747 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050214591
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 13.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategy implementation: a role for the balanced scorecard? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/00251740610715740
- The paper
- Atkinson, H. (2006). Strategy implementation: a role for the balanced scorecard? Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740610715740
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.