The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why and how to adopt green management into business organizations?: The case study of Korean SMEs in manufacturing industry
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore and investigate the process of green management adoption in small and medium‐sized enterprises. Design/methodology/approach: The study used the qualitative methods of case study, in‐depth interviews and document analysis to collect data from two companies, one in the acoustic equipment, the other in the electronics industry. Findings: The paper finds that the extant literature in the field of business and management has largely ignored green management practices within small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs). The study finds that SMEs can make themselves greener by making strategic and organizational changes. For greener management, the factors of organizational structure, innovation capability, human resources, cost savings and competitive advantage can influence organizational change. The outcomes of the case studies confirmed this. The paper argues that further research is needed in order to identify how management practice might reduce negative sustainability impacts. The paper argues that such research can benefit from the methodological and theoretical insights of other disciplines. Originality/value: The paper is of benefit to academics and managers by providing a new way to consider green management and strategies of SMEs. Since green sustainability is obviously challenging to all companies, to increase understanding of how to cope with green management is necessary, but has been rarely researched in SMEs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hartley, J. (2004) · Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research · doi:10.4135/9781446280119.n26 · Cited by 15,461
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
Porter, M. E. (1991) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0491-168 · Cited by 1,540
Banerjee, S. B. (2001) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00246 · Cited by 538 · cited 1×
“their business globally (Banerjee, 2001).”
Cited by
Chen, Y., & Chang, C. (2012) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251741211216250 · Cited by 1,370
Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance
Lee, K.-H., & Min, B. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.114 · Cited by 1,028
Self-citationA systematic review on green human resource management: Implications for social sustainability
Amrutha, V. N., & Geetha, S. N. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119131 · Cited by 685
Green supply chain management and organizational performance
Lee, S. M., Tae Kim, S., & Choi, D. (2012) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/02635571211264609 · Cited by 375
Lee, K., & Kim, J. (2011) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.714 · Cited by 342
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, K.
- Venue
- Management Decision
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2009-07-31
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1101-1121
- ISSN
- 0025-1747 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1555245017
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 36.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why and how to adopt green management into business organizations?: The case study of Korean SMEs in manufacturing industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/00251740910978322
- The paper
- Lee, K. (2009). Why and how to adopt green management into business organizations?: The case study of Korean SMEs in manufacturing industry. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910978322
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.