Temporary work and human resources management: Issues, challenges and responses
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to introduce the special issue volume that examines a range of concerns, challenges and responses relating to temporary workers and human resource management (HRM). Design/methodology/approach The paper highlights eight key research questions and describes the structure of the issue. The various articles investigate six main areas: the rationale for using temporary workers rather than permanent workers; factors determining types of temporary work arrangements; the rationale for temp workers entering into temporary employment; the nature and extent of the relationship between TWAs and user firms; the relationship between employment regulations and an organisation's labour use patterns of temporary workers and the HR challenges associated with ongoing and extensive use of temporary workers. Findings Findings varied according to the main focus of each paper. It is evident, however, that no one perspective, public policy or organisational strategy is likely to fit all situations in relation to temporary work and HRM. Many differences exist in the skill levels of temp workers, their demographic characteristics and reasons for undertaking temp work. Likewise, as pointed out by many of the authors included in this volume, there are also differences within user firms with regard to their reasons for employing temps. Originality/value There is a paucity of literature examining temporary work and HRM and this issue endeavours to fill that gap and ma…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Earlier research has gathered evidence that temporary agency workers value the investments made by organizations, especially when those investments have an impact on what concerns them most.
“Earlier research has gathered evidence that TAWs value the investments made by the organizations, especially when those investments have an impact on what concerns them the most [43].”
From The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [43]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Employability of older workers in the Netherlands: Antecedents and consequences
Hennekam, S. (2015) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/ijm-12-2013-0289 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis
Sobral, F., Chambel, M. J., & Castanheira, F. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18136779 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Earlier research has gathered evidence that TAWs value the investments made by the organizations, especially when those investments have an impact on what concerns them the most [43].”
Background
- Authors
- Burgess, J., & Connell, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
- Venue
- Personnel Review
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-03-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-140
- ISSN
- 0048-3486 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974483593
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 9.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personnel Review (publishedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Labor Law and Work Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
- Keywords
- temporary work, temporary workers, human resource management, employment regulation, organizational strategy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review