Cited by 106Employment, Labor, and Gender StudiesLabor Law and Work DynamicsHuman Resource and Talent Management

Temporary work and human resources management: Issues, challenges and responses

Burgess, John, Connell, Julia·2006·Personnel Review

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to introduce the special issue volume that examines a range of concerns, challenges and responses relating to temporary workers and human resource management (HRM). Design/methodology/approach The paper highlights eight key research questions and describes the structure of the issue. The various articles investigate six main areas: the rationale for using temporary workers rather than permanent workers; factors determining types of temporary work arrangements; the rationale for temp workers entering into temporary employment; the nature and extent of the relationship between TWAs and user firms; the relationship between employment regulations and an organisation's labour use patterns of temporary workers and the HR challenges associated with ongoing and extensive use of temporary workers. Findings Findings varied according to the main focus of each paper. It is evident, however, that no one perspective, public policy or organisational strategy is likely to fit all situations in relation to temporary work and HRM. Many differences exist in the skill levels of temp workers, their demographic characteristics and reasons for undertaking temp work. Likewise, as pointed out by many of the authors included in this volume, there are also differences within user firms with regard to their reasons for employing temps. Originality/value There is a paucity of literature examining temporary work and HRM and this issue endeavours to fill that gap and ma…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/00483480610645786

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Earlier research has gathered evidence that temporary agency workers value the investments made by organizations, especially when those investments have an impact on what concerns them most.

    “Earlier research has gathered evidence that TAWs value the investments made by the organizations, especially when those investments have an impact on what concerns them the most [43].”

    From The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [43]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burgess, J., & Connell, J.
Affiliations
University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Venue
Personnel Review
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2006-03-01
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
129-140
ISSN
0048-3486 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974483593
Cited by
106
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personnel Review (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Labor Law and Work Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
Keywords
temporary work, temporary workers, human resource management, employment regulation, organizational strategy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review