Academic library participation in recruitment and retention initiatives
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study is to determine the extent to which academic libraries participate in and assess initiatives to increase or maintain student enrollment levels at colleges and universities in the US. Design/methodology/approach An online survey of academic library directors in the US was conducted. The 31 question survey was distributed via email to 321 librarians in the sample population. The survey response rate was 42.7 percent. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS 19.0 and qualitative data were coded according to recruitment or retention strategy. Findings Regardless of institution type or size, libraries in the sample population were just as likely to participate in recruitment and retention initiatives. However, some libraries stood out as particularly active in recruitment and retention initiatives. Indicators of active library participation were identified. Research limitations/implications The response rate for the survey did not generate a statistically significant sample size, given the population. However, the data generated here contribute significantly to the relatively scant literature on academic library participation in retention and recruitment activities. The findings also suggest the need for the profession to focus on creating assessment tools to measure library impact on recruitment and retention. Originality/value No other studies have surveyed the academic library field to document the extent to which they participate in and asse…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hubbard and Loos reported that 40.1 percent of surveyed academic library deans indicated that the library hosts or sponsors events specifically intended to encourage student retention.
“They reported that 40.1 percent of respondents indicated that the library hosts or sponsors events specifically intended to encourage student retention.”
From The Value of Academic Libraries: Library Services as a Predictor of Student Retention (2016) · cites this paper as [13]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Value of Academic Libraries: Library Services as a Predictor of Student Retention
Murray, A., Ireland, A., & Hackathorn, J. (2016) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.77.5.631 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hubbard, M. A., & Loos, A. T.
- Affiliations
- Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
- ORCID
- Hubbard, Melissa A.
- Venue
- Reference Services Review
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2013-06-07
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-181
- ISSN
- 0090-7324 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053549104
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 33.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Reference Services Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Keywords
- academic libraries, student recruitment, student retention, library directors, library impact assessment, higher education enrollment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review