Cited by 26Library Science and Information LiteracyLibrary Science and InformationHigher Education Research Studies

Academic library participation in recruitment and retention initiatives

Hubbard, Melissa A., Loos, Amber T.·2013·Reference Services Review

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to determine the extent to which academic libraries participate in and assess initiatives to increase or maintain student enrollment levels at colleges and universities in the US. Design/methodology/approach An online survey of academic library directors in the US was conducted. The 31 question survey was distributed via email to 321 librarians in the sample population. The survey response rate was 42.7 percent. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS 19.0 and qualitative data were coded according to recruitment or retention strategy. Findings Regardless of institution type or size, libraries in the sample population were just as likely to participate in recruitment and retention initiatives. However, some libraries stood out as particularly active in recruitment and retention initiatives. Indicators of active library participation were identified. Research limitations/implications The response rate for the survey did not generate a statistically significant sample size, given the population. However, the data generated here contribute significantly to the relatively scant literature on academic library participation in retention and recruitment activities. The findings also suggest the need for the profession to focus on creating assessment tools to measure library impact on recruitment and retention. Originality/value No other studies have surveyed the academic library field to document the extent to which they participate in and asse…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/00907321311326183

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hubbard and Loos reported that 40.1 percent of surveyed academic library deans indicated that the library hosts or sponsors events specifically intended to encourage student retention.

    “They reported that 40.1 percent of respondents indicated that the library hosts or sponsors events specifically intended to encourage student retention.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hubbard, M. A., & Loos, A. T.
Affiliations
Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
Venue
Reference Services Review
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2013-06-07
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
157-181
ISSN
0090-7324 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053549104
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4
FWCI
33.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reference Services Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
academic libraries, student recruitment, student retention, library directors, library impact assessment, higher education enrollment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review