The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Implementing lean production systems: barriers to change
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is help understand why implementing continuous improvement (CI) strategies can be difficult at times. It also addresses the problem of resistance to change within even those firms whose CEO is most fully committed to implementation of CI programs. Design/methodology/approach - The study focuses on aFortune500 manufacturing plant located in the Eastern USA. A survey was distributed to both salaried and unionized hourly employees. Findings - Results from the survey show that the problem lies primarily with an aging and high seniority hourly workforce and a lack of committed leadership at this research site. For example, salaried employees consistently provided higher positive ratings of CI initiatives. In addition, higher seniority was directly correlated with negative ratings. Finally, the study found that employees do not feel valued when they contribute to the improvement processes and that 100 per cent of the hourly male employees disagreed that “The Company considers the employees as the most important asset and will do what ever they can to keep their people”. Research limitations/implications - More theoretical questions cannot be added because of some internal constraints. Another limitation includes a workforce that is high in seniority in the hourly employees because of the unique situation in this company. This research paper asserts that both workers and unions need to understand that embracing positive change is their only route to job security in this global economy. Practical implications - This study attempts to answer the following question: given that every company needs to improve its processes to remain competitive in the global market, why is it still difficult to implement total quality and lean programs? Originality/value - This research addresses an issue that has not been covered in prior research. Most studies of process improvement deal with successful implementation. The data in this study comes from a firm which, while thoroughly committed to the concept of continuous improvement, has achieved only partial success due to the persistence of legacy attitudes on the part of unionized and high seniority employees.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Successful lean implementation: Organizational culture and soft lean practices
Bortolotti, T., Boscari, S., & Danese, P. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.013 · Cited by 678
A new value stream mapping approach for healthcare environments
Henrique, D. B., Rentes, A. F., Godinho Filho, M., & Esposto, K. F. (2016) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2015.1051159 · Cited by 148
Lean product development and lean manufacturing: Testing moderation effects
Marodin, G., Frank, A. G., Tortorella, G. L., & Netland, T. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.07.009 · Cited by 139
Lean production and operational performance in the Brazilian automotive supply chain
Marodin, G. A., Frank, A. G., Tortorella, G. L., & Fetterman, D. C. (2019) · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence · doi:10.1080/14783363.2017.1308221 · Cited by 111
Research gaps in Lean manufacturing: a systematic literature review
Psomas, E., & Antony, J. (2019) · International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management · doi:10.1108/ijqrm-12-2017-0260 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Sim, K. L., & Rogers, J. W.
- Venue
- Management Research News
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2008-12-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-49
- ISSN
- 0140-9174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018570186
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implementing lean production systems: barriers to change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/01409170910922014
- The paper
- Sim, K. L., & Rogers, J. W. (2008). Implementing lean production systems: barriers to change. Management Research News. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170910922014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.