Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 235

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Implementing lean production systems: barriers to change

Sim, Khim L., Rogers, John W.·2008·Management Research News

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is help understand why implementing continuous improvement (CI) strategies can be difficult at times. It also addresses the problem of resistance to change within even those firms whose CEO is most fully committed to implementation of CI programs. Design/methodology/approach - The study focuses on aFortune500 manufacturing plant located in the Eastern USA. A survey was distributed to both salaried and unionized hourly employees. Findings - Results from the survey show that the problem lies primarily with an aging and high seniority hourly workforce and a lack of committed leadership at this research site. For example, salaried employees consistently provided higher positive ratings of CI initiatives. In addition, higher seniority was directly correlated with negative ratings. Finally, the study found that employees do not feel valued when they contribute to the improvement processes and that 100 per cent of the hourly male employees disagreed that “The Company considers the employees as the most important asset and will do what ever they can to keep their people”. Research limitations/implications - More theoretical questions cannot be added because of some internal constraints. Another limitation includes a workforce that is high in seniority in the hourly employees because of the unique situation in this company. This research paper asserts that both workers and unions need to understand that embracing positive change is their only route to job security in this global economy. Practical implications - This study attempts to answer the following question: given that every company needs to improve its processes to remain competitive in the global market, why is it still difficult to implement total quality and lean programs? Originality/value - This research addresses an issue that has not been covered in prior research. Most studies of process improvement deal with successful implementation. The data in this study comes from a firm which, while thoroughly committed to the concept of continuous improvement, has achieved only partial success due to the persistence of legacy attitudes on the part of unionized and high seniority employees.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/01409170910922014

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 235

Metadata

Authors
Sim, K. L., & Rogers, J. W.
Venue
Management Research News
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2008-12-12
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
37-49
ISSN
0140-9174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018570186
Cited by
235
References
0
FWCI
9.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implementing lean production systems: barriers to change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/01409170910922014
The paper
Sim, K. L., & Rogers, J. W. (2008). Implementing lean production systems: barriers to change. Management Research News. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170910922014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.