The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Green supply chain management in leading manufacturers: Case studies in Japanese large companies
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to introduce environmental, green supply chain management (GSCM), experiences of large Japanese manufacturers. Design/methodology/approach: Using an investigation of nine large Japanese manufacturers, this paper examines GSCM implementation as well as their performance improvement and drivers among these manufacturers. Findings: A comparative analysis shows that Japanese large manufacturers implement one key GSCM practice, internal environmental management, much more actively and effectively than Chinese manufacturers. The sample of Japanese manufacturers implement four other GSCM practices – green purchasing, customer cooperation with environmental considerations, eco‐design and investment recovery – at similar levels when compared to Chinese manufacturers. Even at the initial stage of GSCM implementation, large Japanese companies have made significant improvements for environmental and financial performance but not for operational performance. Research limitations/implications: Experiences in GSCM practices among those large manufacturers can be disseminated to smaller companies in Japan as well as companies in developing countries such as China. To establish mechanisms to diffuse GSCM innovation from leading companies requires further research. Originality/value: This paper indicates that large companies can green their supply chain by establishing win‐win relationships with their smaller suppliers and customers, and thus realize sustainable development for the whole supply chains. It also indicates that appropriate regulations and policies set by governments can help GSCM diffusion from larger leading companies to smaller companies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
Cited by
Abu Seman, N. A., Govindan, K., Mardani, A., Zakuan, N., Mat Saman, M. Z., Hooker, R. E., & Ozkul, S. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.211 · Cited by 574
Zeng, H., Chen, X., Xiao, X., & Zhou, Z. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.093 · Cited by 474
Application of fuzzy VIKOR for evaluation of green supply chain management practices
Rostamzadeh, R., Govindan, K., Esmaeili, A., & Sabaghi, M. (2015) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.045 · Cited by 440
Vanalle, R. M., Ganga, G. M. D., Godinho Filho, M., & Lucato, W. C. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.066 · Cited by 431
Li, G., Li, L., Choi, T., & Sethi, S. P. (2020) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1002/joom.1061 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., Fujita, T., & Hashimoto, S.
- Venue
- Management Research Review
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2010-03-26
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 380-392
- ISSN
- 2040-8269 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1554242993
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 38.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green supply chain management in leading manufacturers: Case studies in Japanese large companies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/01409171011030471
- The paper
- Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., Fujita, T., & Hashimoto, S. (2010). Green supply chain management in leading manufacturers: Case studies in Japanese large companies. Management Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171011030471
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.