The effect of web communities on consumers' initial trust in B2C e‐commerce websites
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to test the effectiveness of the mere integration of social network applications to provide a signal concerning the “trustworthiness” of an unfamiliar e‐vendor in order to enhance subsequent purchase intentions. Design/methodology/approach To investigate the impact of web communities on consumers' initial trust beliefs (i.e. ability, benevolence and integrity), a 2×3 between‐subjects full factorial online experiment was carried out, using a fictitious web site for a gift gadgets selling company, manipulating it for inclusion or exclusion of a “social networking site”, and for inclusion or exclusion of “a corporate blog (text only blog, photo and text blog, or no blog)”. Data were obtained from 226 online shoppers. Findings Although the authors could not reveal any effects of the integration of social network applications on “ability” beliefs, it was possible to demonstrate their capacity to “signal” “benevolence” and “integrity”, which in turn have a significant impact on purchase intentions. Unfamiliar e‐retailers may foster perceptions of “integrity” by utilizing text‐blogs into their web sites, but they should avoid embedding facial photos of shop representatives in the blog. If e‐retailers want to make use of “a corporate blog with facial photo”, it is recommended to combine it with the integration of a social networking site such as Facebook in order to boost perceptions of “benevolence”. Research limitations/implications The simple i…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 82 · Cited by 128
- Authors
- Brengman, M., & Karimov, F. P.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
- Westminster International University in Tashkent (UZ)
- Venue
- Management Research Review
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2012-08-03
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 791-817
- ISSN
- 2040-8269 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090330812
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 27.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Management Research Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- online communities, consumer trust, B2C e-commerce, social networking sites, corporate blogs, purchase intention, trustworthiness, benevolence, integrity, ability beliefs, Facebook, online store
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review