The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The relationship between commitment and organizational culture, subculture, leadership style and job satisfaction in organizational change and development
Abstract
The concept of organizational commitment has been examined extensively in organizational literature, yet the relationships between organizational culture, subculture and commitment have received little attention so far. Acknowledging the complexity and the multifaceted nature of antecedents involved in organizational commitment, it is still necessary to understand the dynamics of relationships between these variables. It was found that organizational subculture was more strongly related to commitment than was organizational culture. Satisfaction with the level of control over working environment had the highest correlation with the level of commitment. The leadership style variable, consideration, was also relatively strongly related to commitment when compared with other variables. There was a small positive association between age and commitment. However, participants’ level of education, years in position and years of experience failed to show any relationship with commitment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bases of social power, leadership styles, and organizational commitment
Pierro, A., Raven, B. H., Amato, C., & Bélanger, J. J. (2013) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00207594.2012.733398 · Cited by 105
Kim, D., Moon, C. W., & Shin, J. (2018) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/lodj-06-2017-0173 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Lok, P., & Crawford, J.
- Venue
- Leadership & Organization Development Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 1999-12-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 365-374
- ISSN
- 0143-7739 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977059724
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.