Cited by 8Aging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Institutional care provisions for the aged in Sri Lanka and some reflections on issues of “care” and “company”

Risseeuw, Carla·2012·International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this article is to, within the specific Sri Lankan figures on ageing within South Asia (comparatively high longevity and high figures on intergenerational family‐living), look into the interpretations of social care and everyday social life in urban elder homes in Colombo. What does everyday social life look like and how are underlying meanings of care given shape? To highlight the taken for granted quality of much of everyday care, comparisons are made on the basis of earlier ethnographic research by Indian scholars on Dutch senior homes. Design/methodology/approach The methodology relied on analysis of existing quantitative data on ageing in Sri Lanka and on research generated by the four‐year team‐study of which the author was part. Specific data in this article were collected through qualitative research by the author: regular visiting and participating in activities within certain selected homes in Colombo, over a period of four months. In addition survey data were collected on 55 senior homes in Colombo. Findings Against a background of available statistical data on ageing; family and institutional care, qualitative research findings are provided on everyday life within the Colombo homes, Sri Lanka. What kind of care (“Araksha kerime”) is given and/or aimed for? The concept of “social care” (Daly and Lewis) is the starting point to understand how normative and social frameworks within which “care” is understood and undertaken. Cross cultural compa…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/01443331211280728

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Chatterji, R. (1998), “An ethnography of dementia: a case study of an Alzheimer's disease patient in The Netherlands”, Culture, Medicine & Psychiatry, Vol. 22, pp. 355‐82. · DOI
  2. Chowdhury, S.D. (1991), “An introduction to the home for the aged”, Chapter VI, pp. 240‐62; “Normality, dependency and time”, Chapter VII, pp. 262‐314, in van der Veen, K. and Das, V. (Eds), The Welfare State from the Outside: Aging, Social Structure and Professional Care in The Netherlands, unpublished manuscript.
  3. Daly, M. and Lewis, J. (2000), “The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states”, British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 51 No. 2, pp. 281‐98. · DOI
  4. Fabian, J. (2002), Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object, Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
  5. Ganesh, K. (2005), “Made to measure: Dutch elder care at the intersections of policy and culture”, in Risseeuw, C., Palriwala, R. and Ganesh, K. (Eds), Care Culture and Citizenship, Revisiting the Politics of the Dutch Welfare State, Het Spinhuis, Amsterdam, pp. 116‐57.
  6. Goody, J. (2000), The European Family, Blackwell, Oxford.
  7. Hashimoto, A. (1996), The Gift of Generations: Japanese and American Perspectives on Aging and the Social Contract, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. · DOI
  8. Ingold, T. (Ed.) (1996), Key Debates in Anthropology, Routledge, London.
  9. Jamieson, L. (1998), Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  10. Mines, M. (1994), Public Faces, Private Lives: Community and Individuality in South India, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. · DOI
  11. Obeyesekere, G. (1967), Land Tenure in Ceylon: A Sociological and Historical Study, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  12. Overing, J. and Passes, A. (2000), The Anthropology of Love and Anger: The Aesthetics of Conviviality in Native Amazonia, Routledge, London.
  13. Rajan, S.I., Risseeuw, C. and Perera, M. (2008), Institutional Provisions and Care for the Aged, Perspectives from Asia and Europe, Anthem Press, London. · DOI
  14. Siddhisena, K.A.P. (2005), Socio‐economic Implications of Ageing in Sri Lanka: An Overview, Working Paper No. WP105, Oxford Institute of Ageing, Oxford.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Risseeuw, C.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Risseeuw, Carla
Venue
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2012-10-19
Volume
32
Issue
11/12
Pages
695-707
ISSN
0144-333X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093368021
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
institutional care, senior homes, elderly care, social care, everyday social life, loneliness and isolation, cross-cultural comparison, Sri Lanka, Colombo

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review