The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Manufacturing strategy: Literature review and some issues
Abstract
Manufacturing strategy has attracted serious research attention in the recent past. In this paper, an attempt is made to review the status of literature in manufacturing strategy. A literature classification scheme is suggested. A total of 260 articles from 31 referred journals and international conferences are classified into content (manufacturing capabilities, strategic choices, best practices, trans‐national comparison, literature survey, and performance measurement) and process‐related issues. We have categorized the methodology used in the literature into conceptual, descriptive, empirical, exploratory cross‐sectional and exploratory longitudinal approaches. Based on this, some possible research issues are also identified, viz., resource‐based operations strategy, sector specific manufacturing strategy, relevance of manufacturing strategy to small and medium enterprises, manufacturing strategy in the context of green manufacturing, effect of organizational culture on formulation of manufacturing strategy, and performance measurement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation
Grant, R. M. (1991) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41166664 · Cited by 9,699
Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy
Barney, J. B. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231 · Cited by 5,548
Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda
Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443579510083622 · Cited by 3,259
Towards a definition of flexibility: in search of the Holy Grail?
Golden, W., & Powell, P. (2000) · Omega · doi:10.1016/s0305-0483(99)00057-2 · Cited by 305
Cited by
Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy – a review
Tukker, A. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049 · Cited by 1,961
Lean manufacturing: literature review and research issues
Bhamu, J., & Singh Sangwan, K. (2014) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-08-2012-0315 · Cited by 983
Lean production in SMEs: literature review and reflection on future challenges
Belhadi, A., Sha’ri, Y. B. M., Touriki, F. E., & El Fezazi, S. (2018) · Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering · doi:10.1080/21681015.2018.1508081 · Cited by 50
Analysis of Inventory Turnover as a Performance Measure in Manufacturing Industry
Kwak, J. K. (2019) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr7100760 · Cited by 46
Pozo, H., Roque da Silva, O., & Tachizawa, T. (2017) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2017.1405718 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Dangayach, G. S., & Deshmukh, S. G.
- Venue
- International Journal of Operations & Production Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2001-07-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 884-932
- ISSN
- 0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158186940
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 27.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Manufacturing strategy: Literature review and some issues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/01443570110393414
- The paper
- Dangayach, G. S., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2001). Manufacturing strategy: Literature review and some issues. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110393414
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
