The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives: Perceptions of participating managers
Abstract
This paper investigates the success and failure of performance measurement system design interventions in ten companies. In each case, the senior management team was facilitated through a management process to redesign their performance measurement systems. Analysis of the initial pilot case studies suggested three important differences between companies that proceeded to implement the measures agreed during the process and those that did not. Post intervention semi‐structured interviews with the directors and managers directly involved revealed two main perceived drivers of implementation and four perceived factors that block implementation. The results are of specific interest for performance measurement system implementation but have wider implications for our view of management commitment in change management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The use of Web analytics for digital marketing performance measurement
Järvinen, J., & Karjaluoto, H. (2015) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.04.009 · Cited by 364
Sustainability measurement system: a reference model proposal
Delai, I., & Takahashi, S. (2011) · Social Responsibility Journal · doi:10.1108/17471111111154563 · Cited by 185
Impact of e‐procurement on procurement practices and performance
Quesada, G., González, M. E., Mueller, J., & Mueller, R. (2010) · Benchmarking: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/14635771011060576 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Bourne, M., Neely, A., Platts, K., & Mills, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Operations & Production Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1288-1310
- ISSN
- 0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1480255171
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives: Perceptions of participating managers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/01443570210450329
- The paper
- Bourne, M., Neely, A., Platts, K., & Mills, J. (2002). The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives: Perceptions of participating managers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210450329
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.