The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 standards: an international diffusion model
Abstract
Purpose: In an economic environment characterized in recent years by globalization and the integration of economic processes, standardization in management systems has had a high growth. In this context, there has been a remarkable increase in certain standards, or norms, issued by international organizations. Among these standards, two main groups stand out, both issued by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO): one for quality management systems – the family of ISO 9000 standards – and the other for environmental management systems – the ISO 14000 standards. This paper aims to analyze the world wide diffusion process of these two standards, using data provided by the ISO itself. Design/methodology/approach: The methodology proposed is developed in four separate phases. The first two analyze the diffusion model over time with a model based on the logistic curve proposed by Franceschini et al.The next two phases analyze whether the diffusion process has proceeded in a relatively homogeneous way in the different sectors of activity. In order to do that, the use of indices of concentration and instability has been carried out. Findings: The conclusion is that the diffusion of both standards is very similar – in general and in terms of the different sectors. This result coincides with certain hypotheses formulated in the theoretical literature. Originality/value: This is the first paper where it can be demonstrated that, world‐wide, both the ISO 14000 and the ISO 9000 standards have followed very similar patterns of diffusion in their expansion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: Towards a Research Agenda on Management System Standards*
Heras‐Saizarbitoria, I., & Boiral, O. (2013) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00334.x · Cited by 468
Self-citationThe Worldwide Diffusion of the Global Reporting Initiative: What Is the Point?
Marimon, F., Alonso-Almeida, M. D. M., Rodríguez, M. D. P., & Cortez Alejandro, K. A. (2012) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.017 · Cited by 332
Hofer, C., Cantor, D. E., & Dai, J. (2012) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2011.06.002 · Cited by 305
How are management fashions institutionalized? The role of institutional work
Perkmann, M., & Spicer, A. (2008) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726708092406 · Cited by 287
del Mar Alonso‐Almeida, M., Llach, J., & Marimon, F. (2014) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1318 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Marimon Viadiu, F., Casadesús Fa, M., & Heras Saizarbitoria, I.
- Venue
- International Journal of Operations & Production Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-02-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 141-165
- ISSN
- 0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970142185
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 standards: an international diffusion model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/01443570610641648
- The paper
- Marimon Viadiu, F., Casadesús Fa, M., & Heras Saizarbitoria, I. (2006). ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 standards: an international diffusion model. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570610641648
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.