The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An overview of intentional change from a complexity perspective
Abstract
Purpose – Change, and in particular intentional or desired change, has not been understood nor systematically studied. By applying concepts from complexity theory to intentional change theory, the purpose of this paper is to provide a new level of insight into why and how sustainable desired change can occur at all levels of human/social interaction, from individual to teams to organizations to communities, countries and the globe. Design/methodology/approach – Using research from over 30 years of longitudinal studies of individual and organizational change, the concepts are explored and implications proposed. Findings – Sustainable, intentional change is on the whole discontinuous. It occurs through a series of five discoveries or emergence conditions. It is driven by the interplay of the positive and negative emotional attractor. It follows the described process at all fractals of human organization. Research limitations/implications – Extensive empirical research has been done at the individual level, but only case studies at the organization and country levels. Practical implications – Every person seeking to explore, understand, or facilitate sustainable, desired change can be helped by the model and understanding how it functions. Originality/value – The theory of intentional change is relatively new to the literature, as is the use of complexity theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors.
Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.47.9.1102 · Cited by 8,596
Cited by
Competencies in the 21st century
Boyatzis, R. E. (2008) · Journal of Management Development · doi:10.1108/02621710810840730 · Cited by 1,194
Self-citationUnderstanding Human-Machine Networks: A Cross-Disciplinary Survey
Tsvetkova, M., Yasseri, T., Meyer, E. T., Pickering, J. B., Engen, V., Walland, P., Lüders, M., Følstad, A., & Bravos, G. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3039868 · Cited by 67
Kerr, F., Wiechula, R., Feo, R., Schultz, T., & Kitson, A. (2019) · JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports · doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2017-003549 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Boyatzis, R. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Development
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 607-623
- ISSN
- 0262-1711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081189988
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An overview of intentional change from a complexity perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02621710610678445
- The paper
- Boyatzis, R. E. (2006). An overview of intentional change from a complexity perspective. Journal of Management Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710610678445
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.