Effective e‐learning recommendation system based on self‐organizing maps and association mining
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to propose a hybrid system to combine the self‐organizing map (SOM) of a neural network with the data‐mining (DM) method for course recommendation of the e‐learning system. Design/methodology/approach: This research constructs a hybrid system with artificial neural network (ANN) and data‐mining (DM) techniques. First, ANN is used to classify the e‐Learner types. Based on these e‐Learner groups, users can obtain course recommendation from the group's opinions. When groups of related interests have been established, the DM will be used to elicit the rules of the best learning path. It is ideal for this system to stimulate learners' motivation and interest. Moreover, the hybrid approach can be used as a reference when learners are choosing between classes. Findings: In order to enhance the efficiency and capability of e‐learning systems, the SOM method is combined to deal with cluster problems of DM systems, SOM/DM for short. It was found that the SOM/DM method has excellent performance. Research limitations/implications: This research is limited by the fact that its participants are from a business college of a university in Taiwan, and it is applied by SOM/DM to recommend courses of e‐learners. This research is useful in the domain of the e‐learning system. Originality/value: The results of this research will provide useful information for educators to classify their e‐learners or students more accurately, and to adapt their teaching strategies accordingly to retain valuable e‐learners subject to limited resources. The experiments prove that it is ideal to stimulate learners' motivation and interest.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tai et al. (2008) present an e-learning recommendation system for online students to help them choose among courses.
“On the other hand, Tai, Wu, and Li (2008) present an e-learning recommendation system for online students to help them choose among courses”
From Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? (2019) · cites this paper as Tai, Wu, and Li (2008)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 · Cited by 7,242 · see citing works
Educational Data Mining: A review of the state of the art
Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2010.2053532 · Cited by 2,251 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wen‐Shung Tai, D., Wu, H., & Li, P.
- Affiliations
- National Changhua University of Education (TW)
- Venue
- The Electronic Library
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2008-06-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 329-344
- ISSN
- 0264-0473 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971572841
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 11.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Electronic Library (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Edcuational Technology Systems
- Keywords
- self-organizing maps, association rule mining, hybrid recommendation, learning path recommendation, student motivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review