Cited by 56Recommender Systems and TechniquesOnline Learning and AnalyticsEdcuational Technology Systems

Effective e‐learning recommendation system based on self‐organizing maps and association mining

Wen‐Shung Tai, David, Wu, Hui‐Ju, Li, Pi‐Hsiang·2008·The Electronic Library

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to propose a hybrid system to combine the self‐organizing map (SOM) of a neural network with the data‐mining (DM) method for course recommendation of the e‐learning system. Design/methodology/approach: This research constructs a hybrid system with artificial neural network (ANN) and data‐mining (DM) techniques. First, ANN is used to classify the e‐Learner types. Based on these e‐Learner groups, users can obtain course recommendation from the group's opinions. When groups of related interests have been established, the DM will be used to elicit the rules of the best learning path. It is ideal for this system to stimulate learners' motivation and interest. Moreover, the hybrid approach can be used as a reference when learners are choosing between classes. Findings: In order to enhance the efficiency and capability of e‐learning systems, the SOM method is combined to deal with cluster problems of DM systems, SOM/DM for short. It was found that the SOM/DM method has excellent performance. Research limitations/implications: This research is limited by the fact that its participants are from a business college of a university in Taiwan, and it is applied by SOM/DM to recommend courses of e‐learners. This research is useful in the domain of the e‐learning system. Originality/value: The results of this research will provide useful information for educators to classify their e‐learners or students more accurately, and to adapt their teaching strategies accordingly to retain valuable e‐learners subject to limited resources. The experiments prove that it is ideal to stimulate learners' motivation and interest.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/02640470810879482

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wen‐Shung Tai, D., Wu, H., & Li, P.
Affiliations
National Changhua University of Education (TW)
Venue
The Electronic Library
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2008-06-06
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
329-344
ISSN
0264-0473 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971572841
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
11.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Electronic Library (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Edcuational Technology Systems
Keywords
self-organizing maps, association rule mining, hybrid recommendation, learning path recommendation, student motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review