The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The impact of “soft” and “hard” TQM elements on quality management results
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationships between “soft” and “hard” TQM elements and quality management results. Design/methodology/approach: Empirical data were drawn from 370 Greek companies using the questionnaire method. Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to examine constructs' reliability and validity, while the relationships between them were examined through Structural Equation Modelling. Findings: The study proved that quality improvement and the consolidation of the company's market position are influenced mainly by adopting “soft” TQM elements and secondarily “hard” TQM elements. Research limitations/implications: The fact that the study was based on quality managers' perceptions and the participation of companies from all sectors creates limitations, but also future research orientations. Practical implications: To achieve benefits and obtain a competitive advantage, which is of major importance for the sustainability of a company, quality design, control and improvement tools are not enough and the adoption of a TQM culture is primarily required. Originality/value: The study describes in a reliable and valid way a model which consists of “soft” and “hard” TQM elements and quality management results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Successful lean implementation: Organizational culture and soft lean practices
Bortolotti, T., Boscari, S., & Danese, P. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.013 · Cited by 678
Aboelmaged, M. G. (2014) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.05.002 · Cited by 355
Identification of problems of implementation of Lean concept in the SME sector
Ulewicz, R., & Kucęba, R. (2016) · Ekonomia i Zarzadzanie · doi:10.1515/emj-2016-0002 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Fotopoulos, C. B., & Psomas, E. L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2009-01-30
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 150-163
- ISSN
- 0265-671X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013347256
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of “soft” and “hard” TQM elements on quality management results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02656710910928798
- The paper
- Fotopoulos, C. B., & Psomas, E. L. (2009). The impact of “soft” and “hard” TQM elements on quality management results. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710910928798
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.