The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ownership structure, board composition and corporate voluntary disclosure: Evidence from listed companies in China
Abstract
Purpose: The paper aims to examine the impact of ownership structure and board composition on voluntary disclosures of listed companies in China. Design/methodology/approach: Using an OLS‐regression model to test the relationship among ownership structure, board composition and the level of voluntary disclosure. The sample is based on 559 firm observations in 2002. Findings: Higher blockholder ownership and foreign listing/shares ownership is associated with increased disclosure. However, managerial ownership, state ownership, and legal‐person ownership are not related to disclosure. An increase in independent directors increases corporate disclosure and CEO duality is associated with lower disclosure. The paper also finds that larger firms had greater disclosure, while firms with growth opportunities are reluctant to disclose information voluntarily. Research limitations/implications: Firstly, the sample is comprised of companies listed on Shanghai Stock Exchange in 2002 and only 45.7 percent of representative firms listed in China. Secondly, the disclosure checklist does not cover all voluntary disclosure in corporations as employed and supported in several prior studies. Thirdly, the award of checklist items may be subjected to errors. Practical implications: This paper indicates the relationship among ownership structure, board composition and corporate voluntary disclosure, and provides evidence for Chinese regulators to improve corporate governance and optimize ownership structure. Originality/value: Distinct from prior empirical research based on disclosure behavior in developed‐western markets, this study examines the impact of ownership structure and board composition on voluntary disclosures of listed companies in the Asian setting of China.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Verrecchia, R. E. (1983) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/0165-4101(83)90011-3 · Cited by 3,481
Cited by
Abdullah, S. N., Ismail, K. N. I. K., & Nachum, L. (2016) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2352 · Cited by 367
CSR Communication Intensity in Chinese and Indian Multinational Companies
Lattemann, C., Fetscherin, M., Alon, I., Li, S., & Schneider, A. (2009) · Corporate Governance: An International Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00758.x · Cited by 260
Corporate Social Responsibility in Emerging Markets: The Importance of the Governance Environment
Li, S., Fetscherin, M., Alon, I., Lattemann, C., & Yeh, K. (2010) · Management International Review · doi:10.1007/s11575-010-0049-9 · Cited by 235
Value Relevance of Voluntary Disclosure: Evidence from Turkish Firms
Uyar, A., & Kılıç, M. (2012) · Journal of Intellectual Capital · doi:10.1108/14691931211248918 · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Huafang, X., & Jianguo, Y.
- Venue
- Managerial Auditing Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2007-07-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 604-619
- ISSN
- 0268-6902 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1553013644
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ownership structure, board composition and corporate voluntary disclosure: Evidence from listed companies in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02686900710759406
- The paper
- Huafang, X., & Jianguo, Y. (2007). Ownership structure, board composition and corporate voluntary disclosure: Evidence from listed companies in China. Managerial Auditing Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900710759406
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.