Adaptation of cultural content: evidence from B2C e‐commerce firms
Abstract
Purpose: To effectively target and reach consumers on the worldwide web, companies need to determine what level of web site adaptation is necessary. Explores how cultural differences affect adaptation of web content by B2C e‐commerce firms. Design/methodology/approach: This study uses a content analysis framework to systematically analyze the cultural values depicted on the web pages of US, French and German web sites. To test for differences in the depiction of cultural values on different country web sites, a MANOVA was conducted, followed by a Tukey (HSD) post hoc analysis. Findings: Evidence is found that local country web sites depict the cultural values of that country. Additionally, the study finds that companies adapt their foreign web sites to the cultural values of the target country, but that this adaptation is not yet extensive. Originality/value: This research adds value by extending understanding of the issues of adaptation and standardization on the web in general, and by B2C e‐commerce firms in particular.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Customers from high UA societies need better web accessibility so that they do not get lost on the website.
“Singh et al. (2005) discussed that customers from high UA societies needs better web accessibility so that they do not get lost website.”
From Individual level culture influence on online consumer iTrust aspects towards purchase intention across cultures: A S-O-R model (2015) · cites this paper as Singh et al. (2005)
Cites
Persuasion and Culture: Advertising Appeals in Individualistic and Collectivistic Societies
Han, S.-P., & Shavitt, S. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1994.1016 · Cited by 736 · see citing works
Crosscurrents: cultural dimensions and global Web user-interface design
Marcus, A., & Gould, E. W. (2000) · Interactions · doi:10.1145/345190.345238 · Cited by 654 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ganguly, B., Dash, S. B., Cyr, D., & Head, M. (2010) · International Journal of Electronic Business · doi:10.1504/ijeb.2010.035289 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Sohaib, O., & Kang, K. (2015) · International Journal of Electronic Business · doi:10.1504/ijeb.2015.069104 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Uncertainty Avoidance and Consumer Cognitive Innovativeness in E-Commerce
Sohaib, O., Kang, K., & Miliszewska, I. (2019) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.2019040104 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Uncertainty Avoidance and Consumer Cognitive Innovativeness in E-Commerce
Sohaib, O., Kang, K., & Miliszewska, I. (2021) · Research Anthology on E-Commerce Adoption, Models, and Applications for Modern Business · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-8957-1.ch089 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Singh, N., Kumar, V., & Baack, D.
- Affiliations
- California State University, Chico (US)
- Bocconi University (IT)
- Saint Louis University (US)
- Venue
- European Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2005-01-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1/2
- Pages
- 71-86
- ISSN
- 0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045879078
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
- Keywords
- cultural values, B2C e-commerce, cross-cultural adaptation, standardization versus adaptation, digital marketing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review