Cited by 22Optimal Experimental Design MethodsBusiness Strategies and Management ResearchStatistical Methods and Applications

The rise and fall of the Latin Square in marketing: A cautionary tale

Hamlin, Robert P.·2005·European Journal of Marketing

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of experimental design and development in academic marketing since 1950. Design/methodology/approach The paper does so by taking one experimental design, Latin Square, and describing its history and development within academic marketing in detail. Findings The Latin Square is a powerful experimental technique that first rose to prominence in agriculture in the 1920s and has remained a key tool in this discipline ever since. The technique was introduced into marketing in 1953, and enjoyed a period of great influence and popularity until 1973, when it abruptly disappeared from the publications of the discipline. Careful investigation of the research record of this period revealed that its demise was due to increasingly poor application method that led to compromised results, combined with an erroneous assignation of superior capabilities to full and fractional factorials that occurred at approximately the same time. Practical implications Two major implications arise from these findings. First, the discipline has incorrectly retired a tool that is still unmatched in some key research situations. Second, the errors that led to the technique's demise led to the rise of other techniques that do not have the capabilities that many researchers appear to think they have. Originality/value This is the first longitudinal historical case study of a single research technique that has appeared in print in a major journal,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/03090560510581809

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 39 · Cited by 22

Authors
Hamlin, R. P.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Hamlin, Robert P.
Venue
European Journal of Marketing
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2005-03-01
Volume
39
Issue
3/4
Pages
328-350
ISSN
0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092706648
Cited by
22
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
Latin square design, experimental design, history of marketing research, fractional factorial design, full factorial design, methodological critique

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review