The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning orientation and market orientation: Relationship with innovation, human resource practices and performance
Abstract
Purpose: The paper investigates the relationships among learning orientation (LO), market orientation (MO), human resource practices (HRPs) and innovation and their association with organisational performance. The aim is to show that HRPs and innovation are important mechanisms for transmitting the benefit of LO and MO into performance outcomes. Design/methodology/approach: Building on extensive literature, a model of the relationships is developed and empirically tested using survey data collected from 220 businesses. Data are analysed through structural equation modelling and/or path modelling. The primary aim is to assess direct, indirect and total effects of LO and MO on performance outcomes through HRPs and innovation (conceptualised as administrative, process and product innovation) as mediators. The study carefully traces the effects of each variable to distinguish between indirect effects and mediated effects. Findings: HRPs are a major mechanism for transmitting the benefits of LO and MO. In some models this is even more important than innovation. The results also suggest that LO should be viewed as exploration while MO is the interface between exploration and exploitation and, finally, HRPs and innovation must be viewed as exploitation or implementation issues. Practical implications: The study suggests that marketers should include HRPs in models of LO, MO, and innovation to enhance the explanations of these to organisational performance. This study suggests HRPs and innovation are important mediators. Originality/value: The paper suggests that marketers need to consider the impact of HRPs on achievement of marketing goals and organisational performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation
Grant, R. M. (1991) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41166664 · Cited by 9,699
HUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299806200303 · Cited by 3,971
Siguaw, J. A., Simpson, P. M., & Baker, T. L. (1998) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251746 · Cited by 766
Success-producer and failure-preventer marketing skills: A social learning theory interpretation
McKee, D. O., Conant, J. S., Varadarajan, P. R., & Mokwa, M. P. (1992) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723472 · Cited by 57
Cited by
Organizational Culture and Innovation: A Meta‐Analytic Review
Büschgens, T., Bausch, A., & Balkin, D. B. (2013) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12021 · Cited by 649
Innovation or imitation? The role of organizational culture
Naranjo‐Valencia, J. C., Jiménez‐Jiménez, D., & Sanz‐Valle, R. (2011) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251741111094437 · Cited by 585
Gronum, S., Verreynne, M.-L., & Kastelle, T. (2012) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-627x.2012.00353.x · Cited by 459
Nasution, H. N., Mavondo, F. T., Matanda, M. J., & Ndubisi, N. O. (2011) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.08.002 · Cited by 422
Self-citationSystem perspective of knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational innovation
Liao, S.-H., & Wu, C.-C. (2010) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.109 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Mavondo, F. T., Chimhanzi, J., & Stewart, J.
- Venue
- European Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2005-11-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 11/12
- Pages
- 1235-1263
- ISSN
- 0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069956459
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 41.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning orientation and market orientation: Relationship with innovation, human resource practices and performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/03090560510623244
- The paper
- Mavondo, F. T., Chimhanzi, J., & Stewart, J. (2005). Learning orientation and market orientation: Relationship with innovation, human resource practices and performance. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560510623244
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.