Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 366

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conceptualizing word‐of‐mouth activity, triggers and conditions: an exploratory study

Mazzarol, Tim, Sweeney, Jillian C., Soutar, Geoffrey N.·2007·European Journal of Marketing

Abstract

Purpose: Organizations continually seek new ways to achieve competitive advantage and word of mouth (WOM) represents such an opportunity because it has a powerful influence on consumers' attitudes and behaviors. However, prior research offers little insight into what WOM really means. The present study aims to investigate the complexities of the WOM concept and simultaneously examine the triggers that motivate people to offer WOM and the conditions that enhance the chance of WOM occurring. Design/methodology/approach: A series of six focus groups were undertaken with consumers, these were supplemented by more than 100 critical incident questionnaires. Findings: Two key WOM themes, termed “richness of message” and “strength of implied or explicit advocacy”, were identified, as well as various triggers and conditions that affect WOM occurrence. Research limitations/implications: The study was based on two kinds of qualitative research, but quantitative research is required to fully test the derived WOM model. Further, the study focused on WOM from a giver's point of view. Research into WOM from a receiver's viewpoint is also needed. Practical implications: The present study suggested that WOM activity is more complex than previous research has argued. Managers should consider various WOM facets and, in particular, recognize WOM will be most favorable when it is positive, richly described and conveyed in a strong manner. Originality/value: The paper developed a WOM model that incorporates these additional themes and provides a basis for future quantitative research into WOM.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/03090560710821260

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Metadata

Authors
Mazzarol, T., Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N.
Venue
European Journal of Marketing
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2007-11-20
Volume
41
Issue
11/12
Pages
1475-1494
ISSN
0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084882049
Cited by
366
References
4
FWCI
18.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conceptualizing word‐of‐mouth activity, triggers and conditions: an exploratory study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/03090560710821260
The paper
Mazzarol, T., Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2007). Conceptualizing word‐of‐mouth activity, triggers and conditions: an exploratory study. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560710821260

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.