The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Word of mouth: measuring the power of individual messages
Abstract
Purpose: Word‐of‐mouth (WOM) marketing has become a key focus for many organisations. However, little research has sought to identify the dimensionality of WOM. The present research project aims to describe the development of a 12‐item measure that can be used to assess WOM at an individual message level for positive and negative WOM and among givers and receivers of WOM. Design/methodology/approach: The research includes four studies, a qualitative focus group phase and quantitative phases involving surveys of over 2,000 consumers representing givers and receivers of positive and negative WOM. Findings: Three distinct dimensions emerged. Two (cognitive content and richness of content) reflect the composition of the message, while the third, termed strength of delivery, reflects the manner of delivery. The scale has strong psychometric properties and was found to be generalisable in the four contexts – sending positive/negative messages and receiving positive/negative messages. Research limitations/implications: The authors addressed consumers' WOM messages solely in a one‐to one‐context. The results cannot automatically be extended to a variety of other media, which requires future research. Further, the authors did not test the measure in a goods context. Practical implications: The scale has a variety of potential applications and can serve as a framework for further empirical research in this important area. Originality/value: While much previous research on WOM relates to the sending of positive WOM, this scale has applicability across four WOM contexts, positive and negative giving and positive and negative receiving.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SERVQUAL: A multiple-Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14579729 · Cited by 21,118
The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251929 · Cited by 12,003
Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 · Cited by 6,567
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.10073 · Cited by 5,916
Byrne, B. M. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203805534 · Cited by 4,016
Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication
Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2004) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1040.0071 · Cited by 2,601
Product/Consumption-Based Affective Responses and Postpurchase Processes
Westbrook, R. A. (1987) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378702400302 · Cited by 2,462
Harrison-Walker, L. J. (2001) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/109467050141006 · Cited by 1,583
Electronic word of mouth (eWOM): How eWOM platforms influence consumer product judgement
Lee, M., & Youn, S. (2009) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.2501/s0265048709200709 · Cited by 662
Metadata
- Authors
- Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Mazzarol, T.
- Venue
- European Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2012-02-10
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1/2
- Pages
- 237-257
- ISSN
- 0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085643595
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 79.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Word of mouth: measuring the power of individual messages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/03090561211189310
- The paper
- Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Mazzarol, T. (2012). Word of mouth: measuring the power of individual messages. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561211189310
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.