Cited by 15Technology Adoption and User BehaviourMedia and Digital CommunicationMultimedia Communication and Technology

An empirical study of an enjoyment‐based response hierarchy model of watching MDTV on the move

Wan‐Ling Hu, Anne, Ming‐Hone Tsai, William·2009·Journal of Consumer Marketing

Abstract

Purpose This paper adopts a response hierarchy model to examine drivers' intrinsic and extrinsic motivations for using mobile digital television (MDTV) while on the move. Design/methodology/approach The study used a regional quota sampling method to examine the viewing habits of drivers who have a mobile digital television installed in their vehicles and was carried out in two steps. The first stage had interviews with eight car stereo distributors, and the second stage used a questionnaire to ascertain the viewing habits and content selection of drivers watching TV in their vehicles. Findings SEM analysis of a survey of 480 MDTV‐using drivers in Taiwan revealed an enjoyment‐based model of MDTV use since enjoyment has the most significant effect on drivers' affect, intention to use, and use behavior. Perceived ease of use and subjective norms had a lesser effect. The non‐significant effect of concentration and perceived risk imply that while drivers enjoy watching MDTV, they do not believe they switch their primary attention from driving to programs. Since drivers do not think they concentrate on watching MDTV, program content has little chance to induce curiosity and increase viewing time, the real communicative effect of watching TV while driving must be sharply discounted. Research limitations/implications The paper focuses exclusively on use of front‐seat MDTV equipment by drivers, and does not attempt to examine MDTV use by other passengers in the same vehicle. Originality/value This is the first study that has been undertaken of mobile digital television viewers, and the paper will be useful as a reference for those who are developing the mobile digital television market as they work to understand the needs and viewing habits of their audience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/07363760910940438

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CAB model holds that the decision-making process starts with cognitions, followed by affect, which in turn leads to behaviors.

    “The CAB model holds that the decision-making process starts with cognitions, such as consumer's beliefs, perceptions, attitudes, and followed by affect or the emotions or feelings of a consumer to a product or service, which in turn leads to behaviors, which may include intention or concrete action of a consumer (Babin & Harris, 2010; Hu & Tsai, 2009; Solomon, 2011).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 15

Authors
Wan‐Ling Hu, A., & Ming‐Hone Tsai, W.
Venue
Journal of Consumer Marketing
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2009-03-20
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
66-77
ISSN
0736-3761 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018313799
Cited by
15
References
60
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Consumer Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Multimedia Communication and Technology
Keywords
mobile TV, intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, intention to use, perceived ease of use, subjective norms, risk perception, attention allocation, viewing time, car audio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review