The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The influence of brand equity on consumer responses
Abstract
Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to propose and test a model to better understand brand equity. It seeks to investigate the effects of this construct on consumers ' responses using data from two European countries. Design/methodology/approach: – Hypotheses were tested using structural equation modeling (SEM). Measurement invariance and stability of the model across the two national samples was assessed using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. Findings: – Results indicate that brand equity dimensions inter-relate. Brand awareness positively impacts perceived quality and brand associations. Brand loyalty is mainly influenced by brand associations. Finally, perceived quality, brand associations and brand loyalty are the main drivers of overall brand equity. Findings also corroborate the positive impact of brand equity on consumers ' responses. In addition, the general framework proposed is found to be empirically robust across the studied countries. Only a few differences are observed. Research limitations/implications: – A limited set of product categories, brands and countries were used. Practical implications: – Findings provide useful guidelines for brand equity management. Managers can complement financial metrics with consumer-based brand equity measures to track brand performance over time and to benchmark against other brands. Building brand equity generates more value for corporations since a more favourable consumer response results from positive brand equity. Originality/value: – This study contributes to the scarce international brand equity literature by testing the proposed model using data from a sample of consumers in two European countries. It also enriches the brand equity literature by empirically examining the relationships among consumer-based brand equity dimensions and its effects on consumers ' responses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity
Keller, K. L. (1993) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299305700101 · Cited by 14,686
Aaker, D. A. (1991) · Cited by 7,166
Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity
Keller, K. L. (1997) · Cited by 4,774
Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross‐National Consumer Research
Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209528 · Cited by 4,750
Byrne, B. M. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203805534 · Cited by 4,016
Aaker, D. A. (1991) · Cited by 3,818
Measuring Brand Equity Across Products and Markets
Aaker, D. A. (1996) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165845 · Cited by 3,582
Aaker, D. A., Kumar, V., Day, G. S., & Luck, D. J. (1970) · Cited by 3,553
Cited by
Zhang, B., Fu, Z., Huang, J., Wang, J., Xu, S., & Zhang, L. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.273 · Cited by 257
Rizwan, S., Al-Malkawi, H.-A., Gadar, K., Sentosa, I., & Abdullah, N. (2021) · ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance · doi:10.1108/ijif-07-2019-0105 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Buil, I., Martínez, E., & de Chernatony, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2013-01-25
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 62-74
- ISSN
- 0736-3761 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012317766
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 60.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The influence of brand equity on consumer responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/07363761311290849
- The paper
- Buil, I., Martínez, E., & de Chernatony, L. (2013). The influence of brand equity on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761311290849
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.