The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants of customer‐perceived service quality: a confirmatory factor analysis approach
Abstract
Abstract The research literature on service quality has indeed swelled enormously over the past few years with numerous researchers administering various models across the world. Nevertheless, the SERVQUAL instrument forms the basis on which all other works have been actualized. Interestingly, the conceptualization, measurement and applications of SERVQUAL across different industrial and commercial settings are not bereft of controversies either. A careful examination of the instrument divulges that the factors and the corresponding items are not comprehensive as it appears that the instrument has left out certain important constituents of service quality. In this background, the current research work strives to bring to light some of the critical determinants of service quality that have been overlooked in the literature and proposes a comprehensive model and an instrument framework for measuring customer perceived service quality. The instrument has been designed with specific reference to the banking sector. Data have been collected from customers of banks in a huge developing economy. The proposed instrument has been empirically tested for unidimensionality, reliability and construct validity using a confirmatory factor analysis approach. The present study offers a systematic procedure that could form the cornerstone for providing further insights on the conceptual and empirical comprehension of customer perceived service quality and its constituents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
SERVQUAL: A multiple-Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14579729 · Cited by 21,118
The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251929 · Cited by 12,003
Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees
Bitner, M. J. (1992) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252042 · Cited by 7,271
The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents
Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Tetreault, M. S. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252174 · Cited by 4,860
The relationships of customer satisfaction, customer loyalty, and profitability: an empirical study
Hallowell, R. (1996) · International Journal of Service Industry Management · doi:10.1108/09564239610129931 · Cited by 1,862
Clients as "Partial" Employees of Service Organizations: Role Development in Client Participation
Mills, P. K., & Morris, J. H. (1986) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258392 · Cited by 735
Cited by
Ramamoorthy, R., Gunasekaran, A., Roy, M., Rai, B. K., & Senthilkumar, S. A. (2018) · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence · doi:10.1080/14783363.2016.1240611 · Cited by 46
The Tangibility and Intangibility of e-Service Quality
Moon, Y. J. (2013) · International Journal of Smart Home · doi:10.14257/ijsh.2013.7.5.10 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Sureshchandar, G. S., Rajendran, C., & Anantharaman, R. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Services Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-34
- ISSN
- 0887-6045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005691168
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 14.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of customer‐perceived service quality: a confirmatory factor analysis approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/08876040210419398
- The paper
- Sureshchandar, G. S., Rajendran, C., & Anantharaman, R. N. (2002). Determinants of customer‐perceived service quality: a confirmatory factor analysis approach. Journal of Services Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040210419398
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.