The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What accounts for students' loyalty? Some field study evidence
Abstract
Purpose: Public funding of institutions offering higher education is becoming scarcer, more complex, and to an ever‐increasing extent performance‐based. Concerning the teaching area the financing is partly based on student credits and professional degrees. Thus student loyalty has become an important strategic theme. The purpose is to study relationships between student satisfaction, students' perceptions of the reputation of an educational institution and student loyalty; hypothesizing positive relationships between satisfaction and loyalty, reputation and loyalty, and between satisfaction and reputation. Antecedents of student satisfaction and reputation are also included in the study. Design/methodology/approach: The data source is a survey among students at the bachelor level of a university college in Norway, analyzed by a structural equation modeling approach. Findings: The findings strongly support the three hypotheses. The university college may be looked upon as being satisfaction‐driven. Still reputation management is of great importance. Significant antecedents are identified and discussed. Research limitations/implications: This research has been applied to a specific university college. The research should be expanded to other institutions offering higher education. Practical implications: Based on a theoretical framework the study gives practical insight concerning drivers of student loyalty so that key success factors for the coming period of time can be identified. Originality/value: When determining the most appropriate management strategy, such insight is becoming even more important than earlier. By allocating resources to activities that are important for the students, the managers may increase the value offered so that student retention may be obtained, thus ensuring governmental funds in future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,697
SERVQUAL: A multiple-Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14579729 · Cited by 21,118
A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions
Oliver, R. L. (1980) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378001700405 · Cited by 14,494
Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension
Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299205600304 · Cited by 10,628
The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action
(1997) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/s0024-6301(97)80925-9 · Cited by 8,192
LISREL 7 : user's reference guide
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 6,783
Customer Loyalty: Toward an Integrated Conceptual Framework
Dick, A. S., & Basu, K. (1994) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070394222001 · Cited by 6,591
Satisfaction: a behavioral perspective on the consumer
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-6963 · Cited by 6,042
A national customer satisfaction barometer: the Swedish experience
Fornell, C. (1992) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252129 · Cited by 5,641
WHAT'S IN A NAME? REPUTATION BUILDING AND CORPORATE STRATEGY.
Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256324 · Cited by 5,411
Cited by
Examining student satisfaction with higher education services: Using a new measurement tool
Gruber, T., Fuß, S., Voss, R., & Gläser‐Zikuda, M. (2010) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/09513551011022474 · Cited by 428
Ali, F., Zhou, Y., Hussain, K., Nair, P. K., & Ragavan, N. A. (2016) · Quality Assurance in Education · doi:10.1108/qae-02-2014-0008 · Cited by 355
(2015) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Helgesen, Ø., & Nesset, E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2007-02-27
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 126-143
- ISSN
- 0951-354X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975035395
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 11.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What accounts for students' loyalty? Some field study evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09513540710729926
- The paper
- Helgesen, Ø., & Nesset, E. (2007). What accounts for students' loyalty? Some field study evidence. International Journal of Educational Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540710729926
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.