The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Performance measurement in the public sector: strategies to cope with the risks of performance measurement
Abstract
Many public, professional organizations have introduced performance measurement systems in the belief that they will lead to a transparent organization, offering incentives for performance and able to account for its performance. These systems produce a large number of perverse effects, however. The article presents five successive strategies aimed at preventing these effects where possible: tolerating competing product definitions; banning a monopoly on interpreting production figures; limiting the functions of and forums for performance measurement; strategically limiting the products that can be subjected to performance measurement; and using a process perspective of performance in addition to a product perspective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance
Speklé, R. F., & Verbeeten, F. H. M. (2014) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.004 · Cited by 448
The Use and Usefulness of Performance Measures in the Public Sector
Propper, C. (2003) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/19.2.250 · Cited by 340
Performance management practices in public sector organizations: Impact on performance
Verbeeten, F. H. M. (2008) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513570810863996 · Cited by 338
Constructing performance measurement in the public sector
Arnaboldi, M., & Azzone, G. (2010) · Critical Perspectives on Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2010.01.016 · Cited by 145
Tu, W., & Gong, T. (2022) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2021.1930123 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- de Bruijn, H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Public Sector Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 578-594
- ISSN
- 0951-3558 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046220575
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance measurement in the public sector: strategies to cope with the risks of performance measurement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09513550210448607
- The paper
- de Bruijn, H. (2002). Performance measurement in the public sector: strategies to cope with the risks of performance measurement. International Journal of Public Sector Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550210448607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.