CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 320

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Views of Corporate Managers on the Current State of, and Future Prospects for, Social Reporting in Bangladesh: An Engagement-Based Study

Rahman Belal, Ataur, Owen, David L.·2007·Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
DOI 10.1108/09513570710748599
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: This paper seeks to respond to recent calls for more engagement‐based studies of corporate social reporting (CSR) practice by examining the views of corporate managers on the current state of, and future prospects for, social reporting in Bangladesh. Design/methodology/approach: The paper uses a series of interviews with senior managers from 23 Bangladeshi companies representing the multinational, domestic private and public sectors. Findings: Key findings are that the main motivation behind current reporting practice lies in a desire on the part of corporate management to manage powerful stakeholder groups, whilst perceived pressure from external forces, notably parent companies' instructions and demands from international buyers, is driving the process forward. In the latter context it appears that adoption of international social accounting standards and codes is likely to become more prevalent in the future. Reservations are expressed as to whether such a passive compliance strategy is likely to achieve much in the way of real changes in corporate behaviour, particularly when Western developed standards and codes are imposed without consideration of local cultural, economic and social factors. Indeed, such imposition could be regarded as little more than an example of the erection of non‐tariff trade barriers rather than representing any meaningful move towards empowering indigenous stakeholder groups. Originality/value: The paper contributes to the literature on CSR in developing countries where there is a distinct lack of engagement‐based published studies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/09513570710748599

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Adams, C. (2002), “Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 223‐50. · DOI
  2. Adams, C. (2004), “The ethical, social and environmental reporting‐performance portrayal gap”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 731‐57. · DOI
  3. Ahmed, N. (2006), UNCTAD Case Study on Bangladesh, (no. UNCTAD/LDC/MISC/2006/4), United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), Geneva.
  4. Bebbington, J. (1997), “Engagement, education and sustainability: a review essay on environmental accounting”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 365‐81. · DOI
  5. Belal, A. (2000), “Environmental reporting in developing countries: empirical evidence from Bangladesh”, Eco‐Management and Auditing, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 114‐21. · DOI
  6. Belal, A. (2001), “A study of corporate social disclosures in Bangladesh”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 274‐89. · DOI
  7. Belal, A.R., Khan, N.A. and Alam, S.A. (1998), “Industrial pollution and the environment in Bangladesh: an overview”, Asian Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 115‐24.
  8. Buhr, N. (1998), “Environmental performance, legislation and annual report disclosure: the case of acid rain and Falconbridge”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 163‐90. · DOI
  9. Buhr, N. (2002), “A structuration view on the initiation of environmental reports”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 17‐38. · DOI
  10. Chepesiuk, R. (2004), “South Asia's women garment workers”, The Daily Star, 19 May, available at: http://thedailystar.net/2005/05/19 (accessed 16 November, 2005). · DOI
  11. Deegan, C. and Blomquist, C. (2006), “Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: an exploration of the interaction between WWF‐Australia and the Australian minerals industry”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 31 Nos 4‐5, pp. 343‐72. · DOI
  12. Frank, T. (2001), One Market Under God: Extreme Capitalism, Market Populism and the End of Economic Democracy, Secker and Warburg, London. · DOI
  13. Frost, S. (2005), “Garment factory collapses in Bangladesh”, CSR Asia Weekly, Vol. 1 No. 16, pp. 12‐13.
  14. Gray, R. (2002), “The social accounting project and Accounting, Organisations and Society: privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique?”, Accounting, Organisations and Society, Vol. 27 No. 7, pp. 687‐708. · DOI
  15. Hove, M.R. (1986), “Accounting practices in developing countries: colonialism's legacy of inappropriate technologies”, International Journal of Accounting: Education and Research, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 81‐100.
  16. Imam, S. (1999), “Environmental reporting in Bangladesh”, Social and Environmental Accounting, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 12‐14. · DOI
  17. Imam, S. (2000), “Corporate social performance reporting in Bangladesh”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 133‐41. · DOI
  18. Islam, N. (2000), “Protecting Bangladesh's environment: the role of the civil society”, in Ahmed, M.F. (Ed.), Bangladesh Environment 2000, BAPA, Dhaka, pp. 643‐66.
  19. Khan, N.A. and Belal, A.R. (1999), “The politics of the Bangladesh Environmental Protection Act”, Environmental Politics, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 311‐7. · DOI
  20. Korten, D.C. (2001), When Corporations Rule the World, Kumarian Press, West Hartford, CT.
  21. Kuasirikun, N. (2005), “Attitudes to the development and implementation of social and environmental accounting in Thailand”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 16 No. 8, pp. 1035‐57. · DOI
  22. Larrinaga‐González, C. and Bebbington, J. (2001), “Accounting change or institutional appropriation? A case study of the implementation of environmental accounting”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 269‐92. · DOI
  23. Larrinaga‐González, C., Carrasco‐Fenech, F., Caro‐González, F., Correa‐Ruiz, C. and Páez‐Sandubete, J. (2001), “The role of environmental accounting in organisational change: an exploration of Spanish companies”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 213‐39. · DOI
  24. Lodhia, S.K. (2003), “Accountants' response to the environmental agenda in a developing nation: an initial and exploratory study on Fiji”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 14 No. 7, pp. 715‐37. · DOI
  25. Maykut, R. and Morehouse, R. (1994), Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophical and Practical Guide, The Falmer Press, London.
  26. Mir, M. and Rahaman, A.S. (2005), “The adoption of international accounting standards in Bangladesh”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 816‐41. · DOI
  27. Newson, M. and Deegan, C. (2002), “Global expectations and their association with corporate social disclosure practices in Australia, Singapore, and South Korea”, The International Journal of Accounting, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 183‐213. · DOI
  28. O'Dwyer, B. (2002), “Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure: an Irish story”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 406‐36. · DOI
  29. O'Dwyer, B. (2003), “Conceptions of corporate social responsibility: the nature of managerial capture”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 523‐57. · DOI
  30. O'Dwyer, B. (2005), “The construction of a social account: a case study in an overseas aid agency”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 279‐96. · DOI
  31. O'Dwyer, B., Unerman, J. and Bradley, J. (2005a), “Perceptions on the emergence and future development of corporate social disclosure in Ireland: engaging the voices of non‐governmental organisations”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 14‐43. · DOI
  32. O'Dwyer, B., Unerman, J. and Hession, E. (2005b), “User needs in sustainability reporting: perspective of stakeholders in Ireland”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 759‐87. · DOI
  33. Owen, D. (2004), “Adventures in social and environmental accounting and auditing research: a personal reflection”, in Humphrey, C. and Lee, W. (Eds), The Real Life Guide to Accounting Research, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 23‐36. · DOI
  34. Owen, D.L., Swift, T. and Hunt, K. (2001), “Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting”, Accounting Forum, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 264‐82. · DOI
  35. Parker, L.D. (2005), “Social and environmental accountability research: a view from the commentary box”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 842‐60. · DOI
  36. Rahaman, A.S., Lawrence, S. and Roper, J. (2004), “Social and environmental reporting at the VRA: institutionalised legitimacy or legitimation crisis?”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 35‐56. · DOI
  37. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2000), Research Methods for Business Students, Financial Times Prentice‐Hall, Harlow.
  38. Unerman, J. and Bennett, M. (2004), “Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony?”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 29 No. 7, pp. 685‐707. · DOI
  39. UNRISD (2000), Promoting Socially Responsible Business in Developing Countries: The Potential and Limits of Voluntary Initiatives (Workshop Report), United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD), Geneva.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 320

Metadata

Authors
Rahman Belal, A., & Owen, D. L.
Venue
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2007-06-12
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
472-494
ISSN
0951-3574
DOI
10.1108/09513570710748599
Cited by
320
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Views of Corporate Managers on the Current State of, and Future Prospects for, Social Reporting in Bangladesh: An Engagement-Based Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09513570710748599
The paper
Rahman Belal, A., & Owen, D. L. (2007). The Views of Corporate Managers on the Current State of, and Future Prospects for, Social Reporting in Bangladesh: An Engagement-Based Study. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570710748599