The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accounting and Ecological Crisis
Abstract
Ecology considers the interrelationships between all species and matter. It is argued that there are important direct and indirect links between accounting information and ecological effects. A direct link can be traced through identification of some of the conventional problems of accounting. An indirect link can be traced through economics. It is only comparatively recently that the link between economics and ecology has received significant attention. In particular, the relationship between economic development and environmental quality has come to the fore. The concepts of “ecodevelopment”, an ecologically sound economic development strategy, and of “sustainable development” have promoted the view that there may be positive as well as negative interdependences between economics and ecology. With this linking of economics and ecology, the next logical step is to consider possible indirect links between accounting and ecology, with economics as an intervening variable, since a link between accounting and economics has long been established. Having established these direct and indirect links between accounting and ecology, inferences for environmental accounting based on recent Australian agricultural experience are suggested. In conclusion a brief review of the implications of adopting a “Deep Ecology” perspective for such accountings is given.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Brooks, C., & Oikonomou, I. (2018) · The British Accounting Review · doi:10.1016/j.bar.2017.11.005 · Cited by 831
Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or trend?
Burritt, R. L., & Schaltegger, S. (2010) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513571011080144 · Cited by 773
Self-citationSocial and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box
Parker, L. D. (2005) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513570510627739 · Cited by 698
Sustainability accounting for companies: Catchphrase or decision support for business leaders?
Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. L. (2010) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.002 · Cited by 519
Self-citationSustainability accounting—a brief history and conceptual framework
Lamberton, G. (2005) · Accounting Forum · doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2004.11.001 · Cited by 506
Metadata
- Authors
- Maunders, K. T., & Burritt, R. L.
- Venue
- Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 1991-09-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0951-3574 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005438132
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accounting and Ecological Crisis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09513579110003277
- The paper
- Maunders, K. T., & Burritt, R. L. (1991). Accounting and Ecological Crisis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579110003277
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.