The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The materiality of environmental information to users of annual reports
Open accessAbstract
Reports on the results of a survey of various groups of annual report users as to the importance, or “materiality”, of environmental information to decisions they may wish to make. Also investigates how environmental information is ranked in importance relative to various other items of social and financial information. The user groups surveyed comprise shareholders, accounting academics, stockbrokers and financial analysts, financial institutions, environmental lobby groups, industry associations and other groups performing a review or oversight function. Reports the results which indicate that the majority of the annual report users surveyed believe environmental information to be material to their decisions, and that they seek the disclosure of this information in corporate annual reports. Although the results show that the users typically believe that environmental information is material, they further indicate that the majority of the user groups rank environmental information behind traditional financial information such as profits, net assets, cash flows, and dividend payments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Environmental disclosures, regulatory costs, and changes in firm value
Blacconiere, W. G., & Patten, D. M. (1994) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/0165-4101(94)90026-4 · Cited by 782
Cited by
Deegan, C. (2002) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513570210435852 · Cited by 3,829
Self-citationMethodological issues ‐ Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis
Unerman, J. (2000) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513570010353756 · Cited by 936
Exploring the Ethical Identity of Islamic Banks via Communication in Annual Reports
Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2007) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9272-5 · Cited by 720
Milne, M. J., & Patten, D. M. (2002) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513570210435889 · Cited by 592
Bringing the environment into bank lending: implications for environmental reporting
Thompson, P., & Cowton, C. J. (2004) · The British Accounting Review · doi:10.1016/j.bar.2003.11.005 · Cited by 477
Metadata
- Authors
- Deegan, C., & Rankin, M.
- Venue
- Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 1997-10-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 562-583
- ISSN
- 0951-3574 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006009694
- Cited by
- 646
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The materiality of environmental information to users of annual reports. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09513579710367485
- The paper
- Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1997). The materiality of environmental information to users of annual reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579710367485
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.