The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technology innovation‐induced business model change: a contingency approach
Abstract
Purpose: To construct and test, through its application to a real case study, a methodology that generates contingencies for the evolution of a company or an industry's reference business model (BM) under the impact of a technology innovation. Design/methodology/approach: The paper draws on theoretical predicaments of organizational development and scenario planning as well as more recently published works (2001‐2004) on BM design and change in order to build the primary steps of the methodology. A contingency approach is applied for selecting among alternatives the most suitable future BM. The usefulness and applicability of the provided methodology are proved through a real case study that concerns changing the exhibition's industry reference BM under the impact of a mobile innovation. Findings: The proposed methodology is primarily useful in cases where a strategic manager wishes to draw and assess not one totally new BM but a set of scenarios that reflect alternative configurations for its current BM evolution. Such a methodology needs to be complemented with a contingency framework for guiding the selection of the scenario that better suits the internal and external environment of the company. Research limitations/implications: It is expected that related theories, such as the theory of Industrial Organization and the theory of Network Economics, also need to be examined under the light of BM change to identify and cross‐validate factors that contribute to the design and assessment of BMs. Practical implications: The ultimate utility of the proposed methodology is as a road‐map for leading change in the value‐creation logic of a firm, taking advantage of an advanced technology solution. By continuously changing their BM, and identifying new ways to deliver value to their customers, firms aspire to obtain and sustain a competitive advantage in high‐velocity environments. Originality/value: This paper fulfils an identified research gap for a structured approach towards changing the BM of a firm, which introduces a technology innovation by keeping the principles of the old (traditional) business logic and taking into account the effects incurred from the firm's internal and external environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spanos, Y. E., & Lioukas, S. (2001) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.174 · Cited by 1,113
The business model concept: Theoretical underpinnings and empirical illustrations
Hedman, J., & Kalling, T. (2003) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000446 · Cited by 919
Cited by
Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda
Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007 · Cited by 2,469
Abdelkafi, N., Xu, J., Pero, M., Ciccullo, F., & Masi, A. (2023) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-023-01140-0 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Pateli, A. G., & Giaglis, G. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Change Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2005-04-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 167-183
- ISSN
- 0953-4814 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089565099
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technology innovation‐induced business model change: a contingency approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09534810510589589
- The paper
- Pateli, A. G., & Giaglis, G. M. (2005). Technology innovation‐induced business model change: a contingency approach. Journal of Organizational Change Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810510589589
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.