The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Time thieves and space invaders: technology, work and the organization
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to investigate the shifting boundaries between two experiential categories – home and work – for office workers. The boundaries are both spatial and temporal, and the paper seeks to analyse how certain kinds of mobile technology are being used in such a way as to make these boundaries increasingly permeable. Design/methodology/approach: The research involved both the collection of quantitative data using a survey tool, and the gathering of qualitative data through in‐depth interviews. Findings: The paper finds that the mobile technology discussed enables work extension – the ability to work outside the office, outside “normal” office hours. This provides flexibility with respect to the timing and location of work, and makes it easier to accommodate both work and family. But at the same time, of course, it also increases expectations: managers and colleagues alike expect staff to be almost always available to do work, which makes it easier for work to encroach on family time, and also leads to a greater workload. The ability to perform work extension is, then, a dual‐edged sword. Practical implications: The paper provides both managers and non‐managers with insight into the effects of providing mobile technology to office workers, and suggests some mechanisms to mitigate negative effects. Originality/value: The paper explores the impact of mobile technologies on non‐mobile office staff.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Habits make smartphone use more pervasive.
Oulasvirta, A., Rattenbury, T., Ma, L., & Raita, E. (2012) · Personal and Ubiquitous Computing · doi:10.1007/s00779-011-0412-2 · Cited by 1,190
Virtual Teams Research: 10 Years, 10 Themes, and 10 Opportunities
Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Jones Young, N. C., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314559946 · Cited by 825
E-mail as a source and symbol of stress
Barley, S. R., Meyerson, D. E., & Grodal, S. (2011) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0573 · Cited by 637
The role of organisational support in teleworker wellbeing: A socio-technical systems approach
Bentley, T. A., Teo, S. T. T., McLeod, L., Tan, F., Bosua, R., & Gloet, M. (2016) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.019 · Cited by 570
Working from home: Characteristics and outcomes of telework.
Nakrošienė, A., Bučiūnienė, I., & Goštautaitė, B. (2019) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/ijm-07-2017-0172 · Cited by 547
Metadata
- Authors
- Towers, I., Duxbury, L., Higgins, C., & Thomas, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Change Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-09-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 593-618
- ISSN
- 0953-4814 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965689737
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time thieves and space invaders: technology, work and the organization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09534810610686076
- The paper
- Towers, I., Duxbury, L., Higgins, C., & Thomas, J. (2006). Time thieves and space invaders: technology, work and the organization. Journal of Organizational Change Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810610686076
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.