The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental commitment: a basis for environmental entrepreneurship?
Open accessAbstract
Concern for the environment is gathering in importance within organisations and it is increasingly becoming part of organisational strategic agendas. Within that dynamic, organisations are seeking mechanisms through which environmental concerns are championed and fostered. In this paper, we argue that entrepreneurialism can be an effective such mechanism. But we further argue that this will be predicated on taking a different view of the basis of entrepreneurial behaviour, one that is based on various dimensions of commitment. We posit a model of environmental entrepreneurship and discuss the organisational implications of the model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z · Cited by 11,049
Cited by
PAULRAJ, A. (2011) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2010.03212.x · Cited by 712
Gast, J., Gundolf, K., & Cesinger, B. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.065 · Cited by 614
Lisi, I. E. (2015) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2015.06.001 · Cited by 225
Metadata
- Authors
- Keogh, P. D., & Polonsky, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Change Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 1998-02-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-49
- ISSN
- 0953-4814 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031312506
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
