Cited by 252Resilience and Mental HealthStress and Burnout ResearchSupply Chain Resilience and Risk Management

Measuring resilience in health care provider organizations

Mallak, Larry A.·1998·Health Manpower Management

Abstract

Health care providers offer an ideal setting to study the effectiveness of resilient behavior. The notion of a resilient organization is an emerging concept for understanding and coping with the modern‐day pace of change and associated work stress. Resilience is the ability of an individual or organization to expeditiously design and implement positive adaptive behaviors matched to the immediate situation, while enduring minimal stress. This paper reports on the development and testing of several scales designed to measure aspects of resilience in the health care provider industry. Six factors explaining over half the instrument variance were found, including: goal‐directed solution seeking; avoidance; critical understanding; role dependence; source reliance; and resource access. Results are discussed and future research is outlined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/09552069810215755

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Resilient organizations rely on decentralization, self-organization, and shared decision-making.

    “Rather, those organizations rely on decentralization, self-organization, and shared decision-making (Mallak 1998;Denhardt and Denhardt 2010;Lengnick-Hall et al. 2011).”

    From Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization (2020) · cites this paper as Mallak 1998

  • Resilient organizations are not managed hierarchically.

    “Researchers agree that resilient organizations are not managed hierarchically.”

    From Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization (2020) · cites this paper as Mallak 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mallak, L. A.
Affiliations
Western Michigan University (US)
Corresponding author
Mallak, Larry A.
Venue
Health Manpower Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
1998-08-01
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
148-152
ISSN
0955-2065 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025440672
Cited by
252
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Manpower Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Keywords
organizational resilience, healthcare workers, resilience measurement, scale development, occupational stress, pace of change, avoidance, critical understanding, access to resources, adaptive behavior
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Decision Making, Organizational, Humans, Institutional Management Teams, Michigan, Nurse Administrators, Operations Research, Organizational Innovation, Power, Psychological, Psychology, Industrial, Role, Organizational Culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review