Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 172Work-Family Balance ChallengesLabor Law and Work DynamicsEmployee Performance and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Teleworking: An assessment of the benefits and challenges.

Morgan, Robert E.·2004·European Business Review
DOI 10.1108/09555340410699613
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Of all the changes in work over the last century, arguably the greatest impact upon the way work is done can be attributed to the exponential growth of flexible working patterns. The basis of flexible working is captured by a BT plc strap‐line: work is not a place where you go but rather something you do! As the renowned futurist, Alvin Toffler, has indicated – “work is not necessarily going to take place in offices or factories. It is going to take place everywhere, anytime” (Toffler, A., The Third Wave, Morrow, New York, NY, 1980). There is a wealth of guidance available on how to improve the flexibility available within organizations from the enormous range of “flexible working solutions” books through to the consultancies that now include flexible working as prominent packages in their service portfolio. In this paper, the teleworking means of flexible working is explored and an assessment is made of its growth, advantages and disadvantages, implementation programs for successful teleworking and a case assessing the advances that BT plc have made in becoming a teleworking organization.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/09555340410699613

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bailey, D. and Kurkland, N. (2000), “A review and new direction for telework research: study telework not teleworkers”, working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  2. Department of Trade and Industry (2002), Labour Market Trends, Vol. 110 No. 6, June, Employment Relations Directorate, Department of Trade and Industry, HMSO, London.
  3. Duxbury, L. and Higgins, C. (2002), “Telework: a primer for the millennium introduction”, in Cooper, C. and Burke, R. (Eds), The New World of Work: Challenges and Opportunities, Blackwell, Oxford.
  4. Phillips, T. (1998), “For whom the bell tolls”, Director, December, pp. 37‐40.

Cited by

Items 101–171 of 171

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Morgan, R. E.
Affiliations
Aberystwyth University (GB)
Corresponding author
Morgan, Robert E.
ORCID
Morgan, Robert E.
Venue
European Business Review
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2004-08-01
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
344-357
ISSN
0955-534X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/09555340410699613
OpenAlex
W2060517951
Cited by
172
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
Locations
  • European Business Review (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Law › Labor Law and Work Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
Keywords
remote work, flexible work arrangements, organizational flexibility, future of work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.