Designing and implementing culturally‐sensitive IT applications: The interaction of culture values and privacy issues in the Middle East
Abstract
The Internet, World Wide Web, and related information technologies, originally developed in Western countries, have rapidly spread to a great variety of countries and cultures. Many of these technologies facilitate and mediate interpersonal communication, an activity whose modes and means bind closely to cultural values. This article provides a theoretical integration of a framework for culture values together with a model for understanding privacy and related issues that arise when personal information is shared or exchanged using information technology. The resulting hybrid framework can help understand and predict individuals’ culturally linked reactions to various communication‐related IT applications (e.g. e‐mail, e‐commerce sites, Web‐logs, bulletin boards, newsgroups) in diverse cultural contexts. An application of the framework to cultural settings in Middle Eastern nations concludes the article.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Culturally-competent approaches, such as enlisting community-trusted Hispanic doctors and community leaders to develop and disseminate public health information, may be much more effective than current, more general approaches.
“These trends suggest that culturallycompetent approaches [116], such as enlisting community-trusted Hispanic doctors and community leaders to develop and disseminate public health information, may be much more efective than current, more general approaches.”
From What Do We Mean When We Talk about Trust in Social Media? A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [116]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 113 · Cited by 99
- Authors
- Zakaria, N., Stanton, J. M., & Sarkar‐Barney, S. T. M.
- Affiliations
- Syracuse University (US)
- Venue
- Information Technology & People
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2003-03-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-75
- ISSN
- 0959-3845 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1930699247
- Semantic Scholar
- 753970f966440eb1f16bf922a21e3beaa62bfaa3
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 10.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information Technology and People (publishedVersion)
- Universiti Utara Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Utara Malaysia) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- privacy, personal data sharing, interpersonal communication, e-commerce, email, blogs, bulletin boards, newsgroups, Middle Eastern culture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review